Laserfiche WebLink
stands, which dominate the area, will be complimented with the addition of areas with <br />succulent herbaceous forage. Both livestock and wildlife will be benefited. <br />Seasonal Variety. <br />Revegetation success for seasonal variety in the reclaimed areas will not be evaluated since nearly all <br />the species in the premining vegetation types are cool season species. The seed mixes have been <br />developed to establish the species best adapted to the site, while also establishing species of the same <br />seasonal variety. Thus, since the seed mixes are dominated by cool season species and any <br />reestablishing native species are principally cool season species, seasonal variety measurements are <br />not necessary. <br />Literature Cited <br />Agnew, W. 1991. Personal communication. Senior Environmental Engineer. Trapper Mining, <br />Craig, Colorado. <br />Armstrong, David M. 1975. Rocky Mountain Mammals. Rocky Mountain Nature Association, Inc. <br />174 pp. <br />Buckner, David. 1992. Personal communication. PhD plant ecologist, ESCO Associates, Inc. <br />Boulder, Colorado. <br />Carpenter, L.H., O.C. Wallmo, and R.B. Gill. 1979. Forage diversity and dietary selection by <br />wintering mule deer. J. Range Management. 32(3):226 -229. <br />CMLRD - Coal Operators. 1992. Summer meeting, Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />and Northwest Colorado Coal Operators. Trapper Mine, Craig, Colorado. <br />Cook, C. Wayne, R. Dennis Child, and Larry L. Larson. 1977. Digestible Protein in Range Forages <br />as an Index to Nutrient Content and Animal Response Colorado State University Range <br />Science Department Series No. 29. <br />r� <br />TR -48 50 06/10 <br />