2010-06-21_HYDROLOGY - C1981035

• Permit No: C1981035
• IBM Index Class Name: HYDROLOGY
• Doc Date: 6/21/2010
• Doc Name: Review of 1st Quarter & 2nd Quarter 2010 Wastepile Inspection Report King I & II mines ‎(Email)‎
• From: Tom Kaldenbach
• To: Tom Bird
• Permit Index Doc Type: Waste Pile/Fill Report
• Email Name: TAK
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY
Department of Natural Resources
1313 Sherman St., Room 215
Denver, Colorado 80203
Phone: [phone]
FAX: [phone]
MEMO
Date: June 21, 2010
COLORADO
D I V I S I ON OF
RECLAMATION
MINING
SAFETY
Bill Ritter, Jr.
To: File Governor
King I and II Mines (C-81-035) James B. Martin
Class: Reports Executive Director
Type: Waste Pile/Fill Reports Loretta E. Pirieda
Name: 1St and 2"d Quarters 2010 Review Memo Director
From: Tom Kaldenbach ly
As summarized below, my review found the above-referenced report fulfilled the requirements to submit a quarterly
waste pile report(s) for the referenced time period(s). The report(s0 contained the required information, as noted below. I
have no further comments for the operator regarding the report.
Requirement
Requirement Requirement citation complied
with ? (yes / Comment
no)
1. Inspector was qualified CDRMS regulations
4.10.2(1) and 4.09. 1 (1 1)(a) yes None
2. Report certified by P.E. DRMS Policy
Memorandum of 7/13/84 yes None
3. Inspected during critical CDRMS regulation
Yes
See comment on item 4, below
construction periods 4.10.2(1) and 4.09. 1 (1 1)(a)
An inspection was not done in the I' quarter
of 2010 due to heavy snow. DRMS's
inspection at that time found access to the
waste pile blocked by snow more than three
4. Inspected at minimum CDRMS regulations feet deep. The operator's 2"d quarter
4.09. 1 (1 1)(a) and See comment inspection was conducted during the first
quarterly frequency 4.10.2(2)(a) week of the quarter. During DRMS's 2"d
quarter inspection the operator's
representative was told of the need to notify
DRMS during a quarter that an inspection
will not be conducted due to inaccessibility.
The Q2-2010 report was submitted
approximately two weeks late. Although the
5. Timely submitted report
CDRMS regulations late submittal did not significantly hinder
'
to DRMS (within two weeks
.10.2(2) and 4.09. 1(1 1)(b)
4 See comment s evaluation of the construction and
DRMS
of inspection) conditions of the waste pile, the operator has
been notified of the need to submit the reports
to DRMS within two weeks of the inspection.
6. Conduct of inspection:
Observed and tested to 4.10.2(2)(b) yes None
evaluate hazardous conditions
Office of Office of
Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines