My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:13 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
6/19/2008
Doc Name
Methane Drainage Wells Project Winter Habitat and Wildlife Studies (Aforementioned Studies)
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To compile data on numbers of snowshoe hare and predator tracks, transects were run primarily <br />following roads and trails in the area. A snowmobile was used to access the areas which dictated <br />the location of most transects routes. During each survey transect routes were recorded using a <br />handheld GPS attached to the snowmobile. Transect routes were run in generally the same area <br />as surveyed during the 2007 Block Clearance wildlife studies. Transect routes are shown on <br />Figures 1 and 2. Figure 1 shows the transect routes in relation to proposed pads, roads and other <br />development activities. Figure 2 shows the track transect routes in more detail. Collecting data <br />on predator and prey track numbers along the same routes each time showed if there was a <br />change in numbers of tracks observed between surveys or if patterns changed over time. <br />Transects were run approximately 24 hours after the last snowstorm to reduce the chances of one <br />animal being counted multiple times. Routes were also separated enough to further minimize <br />chances of the same animal being counted more than once. Good snow conditions during the <br />study period allowed for checking in other areas where there are no roads and trails. This data <br />has been included in the transect data for the different habitat types. <br />In addition to the transect surveys, habitat around the Deer Creek Shaft area was.surveyed for <br />tracks. This included aspen stands, willows, the Douglas fir stand to the south of the site and <br />riparian habitat along the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek. <br />GPS locations for all snowshoe hare tracks were recorded. Emphasis was placed on compiling <br />data on numbers of snowshoe hares per mile of transect by habitat type. This was designed to <br />provide information on both numbers and where they were located. <br />Tracks of all carnivores were recorded, but no GPS locations for these species were recorded <br />unless they were observed near a snowshoe hare track location. Total carnivore track numbers <br />by habitat and mile of transect were compiled. <br />During the early winter, aerial surveys were flown for deer and elk and to locate tracks that could <br />potentially be those of lynx. By the end of December snow in the area had reached a depth <br />where all deer had moved to lower elevations out of the project area. Most elk had also moved <br />out of the project area to lower elevations along the North Fork Valley bottom. The lack of big <br />game use in the study area resulted in aerial observations being discontinued. Data on elk <br />observed or their tracks were recorded while conducting predator-prey track surveys. <br />Opportunistic observations of wildlife species not observed during specific surveys, while going <br />in and out of the project area and while traveling in the project area were recorded by species and <br />habitat type. <br />2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.