My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:13 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
6/19/2008
Doc Name
Methane Drainage Wells Project Winter Habitat and Wildlife Studies (Aforementioned Studies)
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BIG GAME <br />When evaluating potential effects on big game habitat use from proposed development activities <br />two things must be considered; (1) numbers of animals that might use the area for winter range <br />and (2) total amount of habitat available both within and adjacent to the project area. <br />Elk: Elk were discussed in the Management Indicator Species section. <br />Mule Deer: Mule deer typically do not winter in the area (Diamond 2007). He has found that <br />deer do not winter in the area. When deer leave the area in any given winter is affected by snow <br />depth. The lack of deer observations during this study further support the observation that this <br />area is not used by wintering deer. <br />Based on observations made during these studies wintering deer move out of the area. In the <br />winter most animals are found below where development activity will occur. Considering the <br />fact that all deer move out of the project area from late fall through early spring there would be <br />little or no effect on wintering deer activity. <br />RAPTORS <br />Raptors observed during the winter wildlife surveys included Northern goshawk, red-tailed hawk <br />and golden eagle. A northern goshawk was observed taking a snowshoe hare mountain shrub <br />habitat in the Lick Creek drainage. Red-tailed hawks were observed in late February and by <br />March were observed more frequently. This was not unexpected as several pairs of red-tails <br />were observed nesting in the area in 2007 and prior years. Golden eagles were rarely observed <br />and all observations were at the edges of the study area along the North Fork of the Gunnison <br />valley. <br />NEOTROPICAL BIRDS <br />Birds observed, other than listed species and raptors, were what would be expected during the <br />winter in the various habitat types found in the project area. A total of 16 species were observed <br />while conducting transects or as opportunistic observations - Table 5. These were all <br />opportunistic observations made while conducting the track surveys. No intensive bird surveys <br />were conducted which accounts for the low number of species observed. <br />SUMMARY <br />During wildlife surveys conducted in from December 2007 through April 2008, no federally <br />listed Threatened or Endangered wildlife species were observed. <br />Suitable habitat for wintering lynx is generally lacking in the area. Areas where there is suitable <br />cover and prey base are, with a few minor exceptions, found away from proposed disturbance <br />areas. These are limited to narrow corridors along Deep Creek, Lick Creek and the Dry Fork of <br />Minnesota Creek. There is a lack of connectivity between these areas. <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.