My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:13 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
6/19/2008
Doc Name
Methane Drainage Wells Project Winter Habitat and Wildlife Studies (Aforementioned Studies)
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Studies have shown that lynx will prey on other species such as red squirrels when hare numbers <br />are down. However, red squirrels only provide a small percentage of food for lynx during the <br />winter when most lynx mortality occurs due to starvation. The low numbers of red squirrel <br />tracks observed in the project area reduces the chances that they could provide a suitable <br />alternate food source that would support lynx in the winter. <br />CARNIVORES <br />Coyote and weasel tracks were the most commonly observed evidence of carnivore activity in <br />the area. Table 2 shows the number of coyote tracks observed per mile of transect and by habitat <br />type during the surveys. There were more weasel tracks observed than those for any other <br />species. Because they were so commonly observed in all habitat types no attempt was made to <br />compile data on their numbers. American marten and fox tracks were also observed during the <br />surveys. Number of pine marten tracks observed by habitat type are shown on Table 3. Number <br />of fox tracks observed by habitat type are shown on Table 4. <br />Coyote - Observations showed that coyotes moved randomly through the project area during <br />four months of surveys. Data was kept on the number of tracks encountered and the distance <br />coyotes followed my snowmobile tracks from previous surveys. Data collected during these <br />surveys is comparable to what Monarch has found during three years of surveys on the Grand <br />Mesa (Unpublished data). Data from those surveys show that coyotes follow snowmobile trails <br />approximately 5 percent of the time and that their movements were very random even when <br />there was fresh snowfalls that were a foot or more in depth. Usually, within one to two days <br />coyote tracks are commonly seen throughout areas that have been surveyed. The limited amount <br />of time that coyotes use snowmobile and other packed trails is very comparable to what was <br />found by Squires (2007) in Montana. <br />As shown by the data (Table 2) there was not as significant difference in the number of tracks per <br />mile within the different habitat types. Again, average number per mile was highest in Spruce- <br />fir (1.21), and lowest (0.42) in mountain shrub habitat. Like snowshoe hares, highest total <br />number of coyote tracks observed was in the mountain shrub habitat. In the mountain shrub <br />habitat it was common to be able to observed single sets of tracks or pairs of tracks moving <br />across drainages and through areas indicating they were wandering considerable distances in <br />search of prey or carrion. <br />During the winter coyotes can easily move out of the project area to other areas or to lower <br />elevations. This further reduces potential competition with lynx for prey in the project area. <br />11
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.