My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980007
>
2008-06-19_REPORT - C1980007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:33:13 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:56:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
6/19/2008
Doc Name
Methane Drainage Wells Project Winter Habitat and Wildlife Studies (Aforementioned Studies)
From
Mountain Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Mine Inflow Reports
Email Name
TAK
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
In the drainages where this community occurs, it tends to be comparatively dense. Dominant tree <br />species include Englemann spruce (Picea engelmannii), Colorado blue spruce (Picea pungens), <br />and subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa) at higher elevations. <br />There is one small pocket of Douglas-fir near the Deer Creek Shaft Site and a few other trees <br />found in some drainages in the project area. The Douglas-fir Vegetation Community is found, <br />primarily on steep slopes, along drainages at elevations around 7,000 feet or less. The dominant <br />tree species is Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menzesii). This community can occasionally form <br />broad transition zones, or ecotones, with the Spruce/Fir and Aspen communities resulting in <br />more mixed vegetation types. <br />Scattered across the project area are small pockets of Grass/Forb Vegetation Community. These <br />are associated primarily with nearly level to moderately sloping sites on a variety of aspects. <br />Similarly, elevations vary. This community occurs as small natural clearings within other <br />vegetation types, revegetated development disturbances, and heavily grazed meadows often <br />associated with developed stockponds. These are found along the Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek, <br />Deer Creek, Poison Gulch and other small areas. With the exception of rodents under the snow, <br />deep snow during the period of the studies precluded the use of this type by most wildlife. <br />Riparian Zones <br />Riparian zones occur along drainages and are characterized by comparatively narrow vegetation <br />communities. The boundaries of riparian zones are limited in width by the steep topography <br />associated with drainage systems. A variety of tree species are usually associated with some <br />riparian zones in the project area and, where occurring, the shrub component is denser than in the <br />surrounding uplands due to soil moisture conditions. <br />In most drainages, riparian habitat is limited to a narrow band along the bottom and is in poor <br />condition. Species such as willows, alders and hawthorn are not found in large stands. Along the <br />Dry Fork of Minnesota Creek many of the willow stands are dying out or are in poor condition. <br />The same is true for much of the Lick Creek drainage. Along Deep Creek riparian habitat is <br />limited and is very spotty. With the exception of the Deep Creek drainage, the limited extent and <br />poor quality of most riparian habitat in the project area, coupled with deep snow was reflected in <br />the low amount of wildlife use observed during the winter surveys. <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />The purpose of these surveys was to collect data on predators and prey in the project area. In the <br />E-Seam FEIS much of the area was identified as other potential lynx habitat. There were also <br />small areas of conifers that were identified as potential lynx denning habitat. Transects run in the <br />area from December through April were designed to cover as much of the area as possible to see <br />if any lynx tracks were encountered. At the same time data was kept on snowshoe hare tracks, <br />other carnivore tracks and habitat type where they were observed. This was especially true for <br />coyotes as they are considered to be a potential competitor for snowshoe hares. Some think that <br />coyotes use snowmobile trails or maintained roads to access areas where they normally wouldn't <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.