My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-10_INSPECTION - M1979181
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Inspection
>
Minerals
>
M1979181
>
2010-06-10_INSPECTION - M1979181
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:56 PM
Creation date
6/18/2010 2:25:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979181
IBM Index Class Name
INSPECTION
Doc Date
6/10/2010
Doc Name
Inspection report
From
DRMS
To
Mount Sneffels Mining Company LLC
Inspection Date
5/27/2010
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
(Page 2) <br />MINE ID # OR PROSPECTING ID # M-1979-181 <br />INSPECTION DATE 5/27/10 INSPECTOR'S INITIALS RCO <br />OBSERVATIONS <br />This was a pre-operation inspection performed by the Division as part of its review of the areas and facilities proposed <br />under Amendment no. AM-2 of this Hard Rock/Metals 110(2) permit. The operator was contacted about scheduling an <br />inspection. The operator's representatives named on page one were present during the inspection. <br />The required notice for AM-2 was posted on the entrance gate to the permit. The required permit ID sign was posted at <br />the entrance gate. The gate is on the permit boundary, and several permit boundary corner posts were also observed. <br />The SW permit boundary runs approximately parallel to Sneffels Creek. Since the mine waste dump extends toward the <br />creek bank along the entire length of the SW boundary, the operator should ensure that the actual location of the <br />boundary (or a uniform setback distance) is well marked, so that onsite activities and disturbance (such as dumping waste <br />rock, routing uncontrolled drainage, or placement of debris or equipment) do not encroach on the creek. The operator is <br />reminded that offsite damage is considered to be a possible violation. There is no problem at this time. <br />There are two approved portals to the underground workings in this permitted area. The upper portal at the NW end of <br />the permit is dry and accesses the underground mining areas. The lower portal near the east end of the permit is an <br />approved discharge point. Both portals were closed and secured. The underground mine pool has risen to the level of <br />the portal since the operator has ceased dewatering the lower workings. The discharge from the lower portal was visually <br />estimated at 50 gpm. The water reported directly to a 3-cell series of unlined sediment ponds (constructed of waste rock). <br />The water level in the lowest pond does not overtop the sediment pond, since the water appears to percolate into the <br />rock. There is, however, a PVC pipe extending from the waste rock slope near the creek about 50 feet below the <br />sediment pond, which is discharging at approximately the same rate. The operator could not verify whether there was a <br />connection. One of the mine staff samples the surface water daily at several locations, and showed the records to this <br />inspector during the inspection. <br />The purpose of the current amendment AM-2 application is to gain approval for adding a milling facility to the permit. No <br />additional land is to be added to the permit under this amendment. The proposed location of the mill is at the large door <br />to an underground room, between the office building and the upper portal. This site is also just feet away from the base of <br />the avalanche path. Portions of the crushing and conveying activity would be performed outside the room on an existing <br />concrete pad. A strong shed roof structure is proposed for covering the concrete pad, to protect it from weather and the <br />occasional avalanche. The permit area is situated at a high elevation, in a narrow high gradient setting, at the bottom of <br />an avalanche chute (which enters the site from the NE). Most of the milling activities would be carried out inside the <br />existing underground room. The room measures about 50 ft long x 20 feet high x 20 feet wide, and is dry. There are <br />three smaller rooms or alcoves extending off the main room. The floor is concrete and contains a slight lip at the <br />threshold; the floor is sloped for drainage to a central sump. The capacity of the sump appears adequate for containing <br />the proposed mill circuit vessels, but it must be maintained by cleaning out sediments and fluids. <br />Additional to the large underground room is an elevated crosscut at the rear of the room, where the operator proposes to <br />place sub-ore (mineralized material that is not economic to consider as ore) for storage. The crosscut is reported to be <br />approximately 1200 feet long, and dry. Sub-ore would be processed, slurried to the rear, emplaced and allowed to <br />decant. That water would be collected and pumped back to the mill for reuse. Issues further to the mill equipment, <br />location, and circuits wil be discussed in the amendment adequacy review letters and not in this report. <br />The upper bench of the permit contains a small shed with a generator and the office building. Both are protected <br />locations. The western end of the upper bench and the mid-level bench contain two smaller sheds and various pieces of <br />equipment, parts and debris. After constructing the mill and its cover, all items not being used will be removed from the <br />permit area. Besides there being a very limited amount of available room on the permit, the operator is reminded that junk <br />and debris add to the reclamation cost, which will be reflected in a higher bond. <br />Besides the lower portal and sediment ponds, the lower bench contains a concrete ore storage pad (40 ft x 40 ft approx), <br />and some stockpiled ore. The pile contains about 300 cubic yards and there are about 15 sacks of over one ton each. <br />No mining is occurring and the ore pile is not growing. After the mill becomes operational and mining resumes, the ore <br />pile should not grow very large either, since it will be processed as it is mined. This is not a highly sulfidic or pyritic ore, as <br />very little orange staining is evident, but the operator is cautioned against leaving mined ore on the surface subject to <br />weathering and leaching. If this particular ore will be in this location for longer than 180 days, the ore must be completely <br />covered by an impermeable cover and/or placed on an impermeable lined pad. At this time there is no problem.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.