My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-16_REVISION - C1981028
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981028
>
2010-06-16_REVISION - C1981028
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:13:24 PM
Creation date
6/17/2010 8:41:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981028
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
6/16/2010
Doc Name
Review Letter
From
DRMS
To
Coors Energy Company
Type & Sequence
SL5
Email Name
RDZ
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />COLORADO <br />D I V I S I ON OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />SAFETY <br /> Bill Ritter, Jr. <br /> Governor <br />June 16, 2010 James B. Martin <br /> Executive Director <br /> Loretta E. Pineda <br />Mr. Donald MacDonald Director <br />Coors Energy Company <br />P.O. Box 467 <br />Golden, CO 80402 <br />Re: Keenesburg Mine, Permit No. C-1981-028, revisions to SL-05 analysis <br />Dear Mr. MacDonald: <br />The Division has reviewed the SL-05 Phase II Bond Release Application, and we request that the <br />following issues be addressed. <br />Table 3, titled "Vegetative Cover: 2Q06 Reclamation Area (2009)" indicates that this data was collected <br />from Area 29. Area 30 was reseeded in 2006 and Reclamation Area 29 was reseeded in 2003. Is this <br />Table 3 data meant to represent data from Area 30 or Area 29? Please provide a corrected Table 3 for the <br />record. <br />Regarding the Sedimentology Evaluation, please revise the USLE analysis by removing the A-A' transect <br />from the adjacent undisturbed areas because this area is no longer undisturbed. Please recalculate the <br />length slope factor (LS) values in the USLE analysis. In particular, the LS value of 5.229 for the <br />undisturbed areas is much higher than it should be, based, on the slope-effect chart in Technical Release <br />51 (USDA-SCS, 1977), a commonly cited reference for USLE analysis. <br />Sincerely, <br />Robert Zuber, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />(303) 866-3567, ext. 8113 <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.