Laserfiche WebLink
February 1, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />properties are presented in Table 1. The Mohr - Coul.omb constitutive model was assigned to all <br />layers. <br />Table 1. Geotechnical Properties of Materials in K -Pit and Toe <br />Buttress FLAC /Slope and SLOPE /W Models <br />The material properties for the spoils are based on previously- established empirical <br />relationships for similar spoils (Douglass and Bailey 1983) . and in -situ moisture - density test <br />results (Capstone 2008). The material. properties for the spoils within the reclaimed G- Strike -Pit <br />were assigned weaker strength parameters, as they have been disturbed by their collision with the <br />slide block. <br />The basis of design is summarized below: <br />• The calibrated rock -mass properties from the G -Pit landslide FLAC31) model were used <br />and an elasto- plastic Mohr - Coulomb material behavior was assumed. <br />• In -situ stresses increased with depth, assuming the gravitational weight of each l.ithologic <br />layer. <br />• Groundwater seepage was not directly simulated; rather, an effective stress analysis was <br />performed with pore pressure based on the depth below an assumed water table. The <br />phreatic surface was computed from straight lines between specified groundwater <br />elevation points. The rock -mass density was assumed to be saturated below the phreatic <br />surface. <br />• The volume of K -Pit buttress fill is 1.0 million cubic yards. <br />• The anticipated make -up of the fill is 70% sandstone and 30% shale. <br />• The maximum slope of fill is 3H:1V. <br />• The placement method will be 100% truck. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />Rock Mechanics Properties <br />Layer <br />Stratum <br />Dry Density <br />Cohesion <br />Friction Angle <br />No <br />(pc') <br />(ksf) <br />(degrees) <br />I <br />Overburden <br />145.9 <br />0.7 <br />11.0 <br />2 <br />[ -Seam materials <br />126.3 <br />0.5 <br />3.8 <br />3 <br />K -Seam materials <br />137.3 <br />0.5 <br />15.2 <br />4 <br />L -Seam materials <br />137.3 <br />0.5 <br />15.2 <br />5 <br />M -Seam materials <br />126.5 <br />1.4 <br />10.3 <br />6 <br />Q -Seam materials <br />110.0 <br />0.1 <br />20.8 <br />7 <br />R -Seam materials <br />139.5 <br />35.1 <br />24.1 <br />8 <br />Spoils <br />120.0 <br />1.3 <br />20.0 <br />9 <br />Disturbed spoils <br />115.0 <br />0.1 <br />9.0 <br />The material properties for the spoils are based on previously- established empirical <br />relationships for similar spoils (Douglass and Bailey 1983) . and in -situ moisture - density test <br />results (Capstone 2008). The material. properties for the spoils within the reclaimed G- Strike -Pit <br />were assigned weaker strength parameters, as they have been disturbed by their collision with the <br />slide block. <br />The basis of design is summarized below: <br />• The calibrated rock -mass properties from the G -Pit landslide FLAC31) model were used <br />and an elasto- plastic Mohr - Coulomb material behavior was assumed. <br />• In -situ stresses increased with depth, assuming the gravitational weight of each l.ithologic <br />layer. <br />• Groundwater seepage was not directly simulated; rather, an effective stress analysis was <br />performed with pore pressure based on the depth below an assumed water table. The <br />phreatic surface was computed from straight lines between specified groundwater <br />elevation points. The rock -mass density was assumed to be saturated below the phreatic <br />surface. <br />• The volume of K -Pit buttress fill is 1.0 million cubic yards. <br />• The anticipated make -up of the fill is 70% sandstone and 30% shale. <br />• The maximum slope of fill is 3H:1V. <br />• The placement method will be 100% truck. <br />Agapito Associates, Inc. <br />