Laserfiche WebLink
January 28, 2009 <br />Ms. Jana Ash, P.E. <br />Office of the State Engineer <br />818 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: French Pit, Leak Test Report; D&A Job No. CG-0201.004.00 <br />Dear Ms. Ash: <br />The 90-day leak test for French Pit located in Weld County is complete. Figure 1 shows the vicinity <br />of the pond and the surrounding area. Figure 2 shows the rough graded contours of the pond. The <br />test was performed in accordance with the "State Engineer Guidelines for Lining Criteria for Gravel <br />Pits," August 1999. The test period began on September 29, 2008. The 90-day period ended on <br />December 28, 2008. However, the test was performed for longer than 90 calendar days because of <br />intermittent pumping and ended on January 8, 2009. The pond level was brought back to the same <br />elevation, during each pumping, throughout the test. The leak test followed the work plan as <br />outlined in a letter submitted to your office by Deere and Ault Consultant (D&A) on October 31, <br />2008. <br />ALLOWABLE LEAKAGE RATES <br />The allowable design leakage rate for French Pit, as calculated by the procedure outlined in the SEO <br />guidelines, is approximately 22 gallons per minute (gpm). The performance standard is three times <br />the design standard or 66 gpm. These numbers are slightly different than the plan submitted to your <br />office on October 31, 2008, because the survey information used in preparing this letter is more <br />accurate than the survey used for the work plan. <br />A summary of the leakage calculations are shown below: <br /> <br />L <br />th Average <br />Area Leakage Design Performance* <br /> eng <br />(feet) Height <br />(feet) (W) Standard <br />(f?ld ft) Rate <br />told) Rate <br />( m) Rate <br />?ld) <br /> <br />Wall <br />2,950 <br />42.7 <br />125,965 <br />0.03 <br />3779.0 <br />19.63 <br />11,336.9 ff <br />Floor 345,359 0.0015 518.0 2.69 1554.1 <br />Total 4297.0 22.32 12890.9 * More significant figures were used in actual calculations than shown <br />