My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-13_PERMIT FILE - C1981018 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1981018
>
2002-05-13_PERMIT FILE - C1981018 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 2:18:38 PM
Creation date
6/15/2010 4:40:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
5/13/2002
Doc Name
Please Refer to Illustration 46 for Water Discharge Permit
Section_Exhibit Name
Illustration 13
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• COLOBADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Water Quality Control Division <br />Rationale - Page 5. Permit No. CO-0038024. <br />VI. TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF PERMTT <br />b) Inatream Waste Concentration (IWC): (Cont.) acute tozicity be <br />detected in any effluent concentration less than or equal to the <br />Inetream Waste Concentration (IWC) or should a species mortality <br />in any dilution of effluent (including 1005 effluent) ezceed <br />SOS, the permittee is required to conduct a series of timely <br />tests to identify and ultimately eliminate or treat the <br />tozicant. The IWC is determined using the following equation: <br />IWC ~ [Facility Flow (FF)/(Stream Low Flow (annual) + FF)) R 1002 <br />Using the facility design flow of 0.29 MGD and the acute stream <br />low flow (lE3) of 0 MCD, the IWC for this outfall is therefore <br />100X (i.e., no pattern of acute to:icity demonstrated in any <br />effluent concentration less than or equal to 1002). <br />c) Relationship to EPA Requirements: The Regulations for the State <br />Discharge Permit System on biomonitoring call for several <br />approaches on limits which are objectionable to EPA. In an <br />effort to maintain continuity of the permit issuance process, <br />EPA and Colorado have agreed to a temporary accommodation which <br />calls for the imposition of monitoring and a series of triggered <br />. responses for control of WET if detected rather than immediate <br />WET limits for selected Colorado permits. (The biomonitoring <br />language in the permit has been revised to conform to that <br />agreed to by EPA. It does not include any additional <br />requirements for the permittee.) These selected permits are <br />limited to those facilities that have no known tozicity problem <br />or potential for tozicity. A mandatory reopener clause will be <br />placed in this permit which calls for the imposition of limits <br />in three years in those cases where a real or potential WET <br />problem has been established. Occurence of toaicito during the <br />fourth and fifth years calls for the immediate introduction of <br />limits. This approach is in conformance with the objective of <br />the Region VIII NPDES WET Control Program in that, under both <br />approaches, limits will be in effect is three yeazs where there <br />is a tonicity problem. The reference in the reopener clause to <br />federal regulations directs that such limits must conform to <br />applicable federal regulations in effect at that time. <br />d) Chronic Hiomonitoring: The determination as to whether or not <br />an individual facility must conduct chronic WET testing is <br />dependent upon the ratio of the chronic stream low flow (30E3) - <br />to the design flow of the wastewater treatment plant, as well as <br />the receiving waters classifications. Since the receiving <br />waters are not classified as Aquatic I3fe Class 1, or Class 2 <br />with inorganic and metal numeric standards, chronic WET testing <br />• is not required at this time at 024. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.