My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-06-07_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:50 PM
Creation date
6/11/2010 3:01:10 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/7/2010
Doc Name
Faxed Letter from JoEllen (Sample Soil Survey, Barx Identified, Dean Stindts Letters)
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
DAB
SB1
MLT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
covering any areas with PRIME SOILS and THEY HAD TO REPORT POSSIBLE PRIME <br />SOILS ON THEIR APPLICATION AND THEIR RENEWAL OR THEY <br />NO ONE WILL <br />HAVE BEEN GIVEN ONE. IF THEY DID NOT REPORT THAT W H <br />GIVE US COPIES OF THE PERMIT RENEWALS, THEN THAT IS FRAUD AND WE <br />WANT THEM SHUT DOWN UNTIL THEY GET THE FACTS AND SOME TYPE OF <br />RESTTrUTION IS GOING TO BE GIVEN TO US FOR WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. AND I <br />TALKED WITH NRCS AND THEY WERE NEVER CONTACTED UNTIL I FILED OUR <br />COMPLAINT IN 2007 was it brought forth and not by any one but ME and I told Dan Mathews <br />they were stealing our prime topoil and still. NOTHING was done until 2008 and they <br />immediately should have been shut down and our prime soils returned to us.... <br />2.04.9 -27 Middle paragraph bottom of Since it is more that 67 prime farmland soil type" This <br />should be approximately 87% since they forgot to include the entire road is also prime soils <br />which I don't think by law they could use the prime farmland as a road either ,according to your <br />rules and regulations. <br />2.04.9 -28 This page is all wrong and also their charts. Tl�ey are showing that the depths salvaged <br />are the depths that are stock piled here including only 22 inches of a combined lift of A &B off <br />the Eastern portion of the Morgan Property The Sunshine place which is another down right lie. <br />They STOLE OUR SOILS AND PUT ON BUD BENSONS PROPERTY AND THIS WAS <br />REPORTED TO DAN MATHEWS OF DBMS AND THEY WERE NOT BROUGHT BACK <br />AND THIS WAS 90 TRUCKS PER DAY, 100 TON PER TRUCK FOR THREE DAYS AND <br />THREE NIGHTS IN 2007. We were told by Lance Wade "Those who hare, give, Those who <br />don't, Take. Flat out stealing and NO one is going to REPORT that that is all that was salvaged <br />or that our depths were not there. <br />2.04.9 -29 RE-do charts to reflect FACTS <br />Re -Do charts to reflect facts On these charts, we had BARX soils up to 72t deep and <br />they conveniently just show A&B, but the soils continue down deepen and deeper and still BARX <br />Your laws say A, B, and C lifts <br />redo charts <br />2.04.9 -32 Re -do to reflect facts <br />2.04.932 "the 1.998Soi.l survey did not cover the entire permit amendment area" The 1998 Soil <br />Survey included all. the properties west of 2700 road and much of the eastern side of 2700 road <br />and they refer to the 1998 soil survey for documentation for everything THEY want to prove, but <br />it wasn't good enough in their opinion to classify our prince f4nnland. Kinda one sided, don.'t <br />you think? <br />2.04.9 -33 All of this page we are objecting to. First off, there was nothing in the February 2008 <br />meeting that was agreed upon. and 1, have Marcia, Dan, and Sandy on tape stating JUST that. <br />There was NO decisions made at this MEETING and this was a guarantee from all of there! i <br />Second off, If the soils are there and I don't care how deep they are, they will be salvaged and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.