Laserfiche WebLink
t <br /> the Fish Creek alluvial system and thus potentially damage the AVF <br /> in question. Refer to the groundwater section of this document for <br /> a more thorough discussion. <br /> The second process may impact both Fish Creek water quality <br /> and quantity contingent upon the activities at sediment pond <br /> outfalls NPDES 008 (Bond) and 004 (Cow Camp) . Therefore, only <br /> surface water potential impacts to Fish Creek via Bond and Cow Camp <br /> Creeks will be discussed. <br /> Seven surface water monitoring sites exist within the Fish <br /> Creek drainage: NPDES 008 and SW-S2-12 are located on Bond Creek. <br /> NPDES 004, SW-S2-6 and SW-S2-10 are located on Cow Camp Creek. SW- <br /> S2-11 and SW-S2-13 are located on Fish Creek upstream of Fish <br /> Creek's confluence with Cow Camp and downstream of Fish Creek's <br /> confluence with Bond Creek, respectively. We may consider <br /> variations in water quality between SW-S2-11 and SW-S2-13 <br /> indicative of impacts, if any, the Seneca II mine has on Fish Creek <br /> and its AVF, therefore. <br /> Additionally, Cyprus Coal Company, under the guidelines set in <br /> the C-82-056 permit for the Twentymile Park Mine, monitors two <br /> sites on Fish Creek, 1002 and 27-A which geographically correspond <br /> to SW-S2-11 and SW-S2-13, respectively. Thus we can compare water <br /> quality at 1002, upstream Cow Camp Creek, to 27-A downstream of <br /> Bond Creek not only to determine Seneca II impacts, if any, but <br /> also to roughly verify the water quality data submitted by Peabody. <br /> The attached graph sub-entitled, "Seneca II Fish Creek Impacts <br /> . . " indicates that there are some discrepancies between reported <br /> mean annual TDS levels by Peabody and Cyprus in 1987 and 1991. <br /> This may however be a result of differing monitoring times and <br /> frequencies. The utility of such a graph is unknown. It is <br /> therefore reasonable to consider Peabody's data as accurate and <br /> adequate to determine if the operation is or is not causing <br /> material damage to the quantity or quality of water in the surface <br /> water system that supplies the Fish Creek AVF. <br /> Both NPDES outfalls are monitored weekly for flow, <br /> conductivity, pH, and temperature and are sampled three times a <br /> year for water quality parameters listed in the "long" list on page <br /> 7-158 of volume four. <br /> Peabody monitors SW-S2-6 (Cow) monthly for instantaneous flow <br /> and field parameters from March through October. This site's <br /> samples are also analyzed using the surface water "long" list. SW- <br /> S2-10, 11, 12, 13 were established in 1987 and are monitored <br /> monthly, May - September. However, as a result of Technical <br /> Revision 20 (Approved 10/02/90) , when no flow exists at the Bond <br /> and Cow Camp confluences with Fish Creek, the two Fish Creek sites, <br /> SW-S2-11 and SW-S2-13 are not monitored. These new sites are again <br /> analyzed using the "long" parameter list mentioned above. <br /> Peabody's monitoring and monitoring plan in reference to the <br /> Fish Creek AVF remains in full compliance with 4.24.4 of the <br /> CSCMRA. <br /> AVF POTENTIAL IMPACTS: PEABODY PREDICTIONS <br /> Mining at Seneca II may effect both the quality and quantity <br /> of the surface water supplied to the designated Fish Creek AVF. <br />