My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-04-16_PERMIT FILE - C1996083
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:08:12 PM
Creation date
6/9/2010 4:38:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
4/16/2010
Doc Name
Overburden Stability Reports, Maleki Technologies, March 2004 & January 2010
Section_Exhibit Name
Volume IIIA Exhibit 16 Stability Evaluation of Terror Creek Crossing
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 4.0 MAINS ORIENTATION AND PILLAR DESIGNS <br />To address the stability of the overburden, we have addressed both stability of near -seam <br />strata during development work and stability of other stratigraphic units above. In this <br />section, the stability of the near -seam strata is evaluated at the corridor for the proposed <br />layout developed by Bowie (figure 1). More detailed evaluation of the stability of <br />overlying units, including pore pressure effects, is presented in section 5. <br />Near -seam stability was addressed using both empirical and analytical techniques. An <br />empirical technique developed by National Institute for Occupational Health and Safety <br />(NIOSH) was used to confirm that the planned orientation is optimal for stability of the <br />rooms with respect to the horizontal stress field. In addition, because pillar stability is <br />important for controlling overburden deformation, factors -of- safety were calculated for <br />individual pillars by dividing pillar strength by stress. Pillar stability was calculated using <br />a pseudo- three - dimensional boundary- element technique while modeling variations in <br />4) overburden. <br />4.1 Mains Orientation <br />From a geotechnical point of view, orientation of the matins should be favorable with <br />respect to horizontal stress to reduce stress - induced damage to near -seam rocks, and <br />geologic structure to reduce joint - controlled instabilities (rib rolls and roof falls). <br />If horizontal stresses are high in comparison to rock strength, mines can experience <br />ground control problems. Under such circumstances, the operator needs to orient the <br />mine favorably with respect to horizontal stresses to reduce stress concentration (and thus <br />the potential for stress - induced damage). In general, the rule of thumb is that the mains <br />should be oriented near parallel to maximum horizontal stress to minimize roof stability <br />problems. <br />0 <br />Maleki Technologies, Inc. Page 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.