My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2010-06-04_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:46 PM
Creation date
6/8/2010 8:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Foidel Creek/Middle Creek Confluence Area <br />Map 15 of the life of mine application delineates previously designated alluvial valley <br />floors in the vicinity of the Foidel Creek/Middle Creek confluence, downstream along <br />Middle Creek to the Trout Creek confluence and downstream on Trout Creek to the <br />Yampa River. Map 15 shows a flood irrigated field at the confluence of Foidel and <br />Middle Creek and a number of flood irrigated fields along the Trout Creek AVF <br />downstream from the Middle Creek confluence. <br />In the 1983 Findings for the Foidel Creek Mine, the Division concluded that lower Foidel <br />Creek, lower Middle Creek and lower Trout Creek were alluvial valley floors because of a <br />presumed capability to support flood irrigated and subirrigated agricultural activities. The <br />Trout Creek AVF was addressed previously in this section. Subirrigated alluvium on <br />Middle Creek downstream of Routt County Road No. 27 crossing does not meet AVF <br />criteria due to limited farmable acreage, as was also discussed previously. <br />The alluvial body at the confluence of Foidel Creek and Middle Creek, extending from the <br />County Road No. 33 crossing of Middle Creek upstream on Middle to the first Trout <br />Creek irrigation diversion as depicted on Map No. 15, Water Rights and Alluvial Valley <br />Floors, does meet alluvial valley floor criteria based upon existing flood irrigation and a <br />presumed capability to support subirrigated vegetation. These findings do not address <br />areas further upstream on Middle Creek, as they are not hydrologically connected to the <br />proposed mining operation. The required findings for the identified alluvial valley floor at <br />the confluence of Foidel Creek and Middle Creek are set forth below. <br />1. The proposed mining operations would not interrupt, discontinue or preclude farming <br />on the alluvial valley floor. <br />The mine plan for the Eastern Mining District was shortened from the originally <br />proposed panel length for longwall panels 9R and 8R. Longwall panels in the Eastern <br />Mining District did not undermine the Foidel Creek/Middle Creek Confluence AVE <br />Proposed longwall panels 6R through 2R in Eastern Mining District presented in PR- <br />04, undermined a portion of Middle Creek; however, the affected portion of Middle <br />Creek is not designated as an AVE <br />2. The proposed mining operations would not cause material damage to the quantity or <br />quality of surface and ground water that supply the alluvial valley floor. <br />As discussed in the PHC Section of this document, significant dewatering of the Foidel <br />Creek or Middle Creek stream/alluvial systems due to undermining would be <br />precluded by the low vertical permeabilities between the Wadge seam and the alluvia. <br />Stream flow loss to surficial tensional cracks which may develop is expected to be <br />minimal and the fine-grained nature of the alluvium will rapidly fill any cracks that <br />may develop. Furthermore, surface cracking due to subsidence is typically limited to a <br />maximum of 50 feet in depth and direct connection to the workings is not anticipated <br />due to overburden depths in this area in excess of 600 feet. Also, any stream flow loss <br />will be more than compensated by the projected and existing mine discharge to Foidel <br />Foidel Creek Mine 46 June 4, 2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.