My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-06-04_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1982056
>
2010-06-04_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1982056
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:46 PM
Creation date
6/8/2010 8:39:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
6/4/2010
Doc Name
Proposed Decision & Findings of Compliance for RN5
Permit Index Doc Type
Findings
Email Name
JDM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
which are tributary to Trout Creek. Dewatering of the streams as a result of <br />undermining is not considered to be a possibility for reasons explained in the Fish <br />Creek and Foidel Creek AVF Findings section of this document. <br />Rule 2.06.8(5)(c) of the Colorado Regulations specifically refers to potential <br />increases in electrical conductivity of water supplying AVFs to levels above <br />threshold value at which crop yields decrease as constituting material damage. A <br />reference initially used is a paper by E.V. Maas and G.J. Hoffrnan of the U.S. <br />Salinity Laboratory published in the Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage <br />Diversion, ASCE., June, 1977. In their paper, Maas and Hoffman list research- <br />derived salinity threshold levels and response rates for selected agricultural <br />species, and group those species as well as a number of additional crops into four <br />categories based on relative tolerance to salinity (sensitive, moderately sensitive, <br />moderately tolerant and tolerant). <br />The Division has taken the approach that a positive material damage finding would <br />be made if projected salinity increases resulting from mining would result in <br />significant decreases in production or shifts in species composition based on the <br />Maas and Hoffman paper. <br />On the Trout Creek AVF, the applicant sampled vegetative cover within a number <br />of farmed fields as denoted on Map No. 1 of Exhibit 42. Vegetative production, as <br />well as cover was sampled in one field (Pasture 11). A majority of the species on <br />the AVF would be considered moderately tolerant, and on an acreage weighted <br />basis only 18.4% of the cover was made up of moderately sensitive species <br />(salinity threshold reached at root zone soil saturated paste extract electrical <br />conductivity of 1.5 mmhos/cm). A number of the species encountered have not <br />been ranked by Maas and Hoffman, and other references were consulted. In <br />general, Aveneae tribe grasses and Trifolium species were considered to be <br />moderately sensitive, while Triticeae, Stipeae, and Poeae tribe grasses (with the <br />exception of Dactylis) were considered to be moderately tolerant. Carex and <br />Juncus species were also considered to be moderately tolerant. <br />Estimates submitted by the applicant project mining will impact Trout Creek water <br />salinity, producing EC levels in the vicinity of 1.23 mmhos/cm (1230 umhos/cm X <br />.73 ratio = 922 mg/l TDS). Assuming that a root zone saturated extract soil <br />salinity of 1.845 mmhos/cm would result from flood irrigation water with a <br />specific conductance of 1.23 mmhos/cm, some decrease in crop production would <br />be expected. The assumed relationship between irrigation water salinity and root <br />zone soil salinity is within the typical range reported in USDA Handbook 60. <br />Based on leaching calculations included in the TCC permit application, and on soil <br />sampling conducted on the Fish Creek AVF by the Division, the 1.5:1 relationship <br />(soil salinity/irrigation water salinity) is considered conservative. However, the <br />applicant previously submitted vegetation data for irrigated areas on Trout Creek <br />(Exhibit 42) that demonstrate that moderately sensitive species comprise a very <br />small portion of the total vegetative production on those areas irrigated <br />downstream of the Foidel Creek mine. The applicant also points out that irrigation <br />Foidel Creek Mine 44 June 4, 2010
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.