Laserfiche WebLink
Twentymile Coal Company to subside the county road. Signage, subsidence monitoring, <br />and mitigation measures to be employed by the operator are described in the special use <br />agreement, as well as the PAP. <br />h) Three hundred feet of an occupied dwelling unless a written waiver from the owner has <br />been provided. TCC successfully complied with Stipulation No. 36 for the Southwest <br />Mining District on March 25, 1994 for the mobile home owned by Mr. Robert Perry. <br />Three dwellings were undermined in the Eastern Mining District (longwall panels 6R- <br />2R) during 1999. One had been occupied year round, one was vacant and is owned by <br />Twentymile Coal Company, and the third was occupied only during portions of the year. <br />Twentymile Coal Company has a subsidence agreement with Mr. Kenneth Ashley <br />regarding his dwellings. (2.07.6(2)(d)(v)). <br />The full-time residents were moved by Twentymile Coal Company to alternative <br />accommodations prior to subsidence of the house. Twentymile Coal Company took <br />precautions with the home by bracing floor joists and door frames prior to undermining. <br />The house was located near the center of longwall panel 5R. After subsidence occurred, <br />Twentymile Coal Company and the Ashley's agreed upon mitigation of the house by <br />replacement of the structure. Twentymile Coal Company demolished the original <br />structure, backfilled the foundation, constructed a new foundation and installed a modular <br />home as agreed upon with the landowner. The smaller residence owned by the Ashley's <br />overlay gateroad 6R, and experienced roughly 4 inches of subsidence. Twentymile Coal <br />Company conducted repairs to the smaller residence in accordance with the subsidence <br />agreement with the Ashley's in the fall of 1999. The residence owned by Twentymile <br />Coal Company also overlay gateroad 6R. This structure was not monitored for <br />subsidence impacts and will not undergo any mitigative measures as a result of <br />subsidence. <br />5. On the basis of information obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) <br />and archeological and cultural resource surveys submitted by the applicant, the Division <br />finds that subject to valid existing rights as of August 3,1977, the mining operation will not <br />adversely affect any publicly owned park or place listed on or eligible for listing in the <br />National Register of Historic Places as determined by the State Historic Preservation Office. <br />On April 14, 1997, the Division sent a letter, map and permit text to the SHPO indicating the <br />scope of the project and requested their evaluation of the project with regard to cultural and <br />historic resources in the area. On April 24, 1997, the SHPO responded and believed that the <br />nature of the proposed project would not necessitate further cultural resource work and <br />provided concurrence for the project to proceed (2.07.6(2)(e)(i)). <br />6. For this underground mining operation, private mineral estate has not been severed from <br />private surface estate; therefore, the documentation specified by Rule 2.03.6(2) is not <br />required. (2.07.6(2)(f)). <br />7. On the basis of evidence submitted by the applicant and received from other state and <br />federal agencies as a result of the Section 34-33-114(3) compliance review required by the <br />Colorado Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act, the Division finds that Twentymile Coal <br />Company does not own or control any operations which are currently in violation of any <br />Foidel Creek Mine 25 June 4, 2010