My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-13_REVISION - M2005050
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M2005050
>
2010-05-13_REVISION - M2005050
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:22:43 PM
Creation date
6/4/2010 2:31:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2005050
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
5/13/2010
Doc Name
Response to letter dated Nov. 12, 2009
From
Rimrock Exploration and Development, Inc.
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
GRM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Surface Texture-San Miguel Area, Colorado, Parts of Dolores, Montrose, and <br />San Miguel Counties <br />J-Bird Mine Site <br />The aggregation method "Dominant Condition" first groups like attribute values for <br />the components in a map unit. For each group, percent composition is set to the <br />sum of the percent composition of all components participating in that group. These <br />groups now represent "conditions" rather than components. The attribute value <br />associated with the group with the highest cumulative percent composition is <br />returned. If more than one group shares the highest cumulative percent <br />composition, the corresponding "tie-break" rule determines which value should be <br />returned. The "tie-break" rule indicates whether the lower or higher group value <br />should be returned in the case of a percent composition tie. <br />The result returned by this aggregation method represents the dominant condition <br />throughout the map unit only when no tie has occurred. <br />Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified <br />Components whose percent composition is below. the cutoff value will not be <br />considered. If no cutoff value is specified, all components in the database will be <br />considered. The data for some contrasting soils of minor extent may not be in the <br />database, and therefore are not considered. <br />Tie-break Rule: Lower <br />The tie-break rule indicates which value should be selected from a set of multiple <br />candidate values, or which value should be selected in the event of a percent <br />composition tie. <br />Layer Options: Surface Layer <br />For an attribute of a soil horizon, a depth qualification must be specified. In most <br />cases it is probably most appropriate to specify a fixed depth range, either in <br />centimeters or inches. The Bottom Depth must be greater than the Top Depth, and <br />the Top Depth can be greater than zero. The choice of "inches" or "centimeters" <br />only applies to the depth of soil to be evaluated. It has no influence on the units of <br />measure the data are presented in. <br />When "Surface Layer" is specified as the depth qualifier, only the surface layer or <br />horizon is considered when deriving a value for a component, but keep in mind that <br />the thickness of the surface layer varies from component to component. <br />When "All Layers" is specified as the depth qualifier, all layers recorded for a <br />component are considered when deriving the value for that component. <br />Whenever more than one layer or horizon is considered when deriving a value for <br />a component, and the attribute being aggregated is a numeric attribute, a weighted <br />average value is returned, where the weighting factor is the layer or horizon <br />thickness. <br />USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 2.1 12/24/2008 <br />Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.