Laserfiche WebLink
Response: In Shannon and Wilson's April 15, 2010 <br />slightly reduced the assigned strength for the lower <br />maintain that it represents a valid lower bound strength <br />selection was based on their review of five laboratory <br />Figure 14. <br />General Comments <br />Revised Addendum No. 3 they <br />bound case for this stratum but <br />estimate for that soil and that its <br />tests presented on what is now <br />34. With the submittal of TR-81 Colowyo is proposing to increase both the capacity and <br />footprint of the South Taylor excess spoil fills. The proposed changes also include an <br />increase in the steepness of the outslopes of the East Taylor and West Taylor excess spoil <br />fills. The above adequacy questions need to be addressed for the Division to make a <br />complete and accurate technical review of the proposed changes. Based on the Division's <br />preliminary review of the materials submitted, it is possible that the Division will not be able <br />to approve the redesigned fills as proposed due to the steepness of the fills and the factors <br />of safety of the fills. <br />Response: We acknowledge CDRMS had major concerns with the previous submittal. <br />However, we believe the changes described in this submittal clarify and mitigate the <br />agencies concerns. <br />Included with this package are a new index sheet and other pertinent material associated <br />with this revision application for incorporation into the permit. <br />Should you have any questions or require additional information, please feel free to contact <br />me at (970) 824-1529. <br />Sincerely, <br />J nifer Sekulski- arton <br />Environmental Engineer <br />Encl. 2 copies <br />Cc: file CF 1.1.2.70