My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (29)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (29)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:26 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 12:56:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/25/2010
Doc Name
Response 1 Revised Pages Section 2.05.6(3)
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Impacts To Receiving Waters ............................. 2.05.6(3) -37 <br />7) Effects of mining on the local geomorphology .................... 2.05.6(3) -39 <br />8) Effects of sediment ponds on channel characteristics and downstream users <br />..................... ............................... 2.05.6(3) -39 <br />9) Effects of sediment pond discharge on surface water quality ......... 2.05.6(3) -39 <br />10) Effects of runoff from reclaimed areas on the quality of streamflow ... 2.05.6(3) -41 <br />Summary. ................... ............................... 2.05.6(3) -41 <br />TABLES <br />TABLE 2.05.6.(3) -1 <br />SUMMARY OF CONSEQUENCES OF THE LIFE -OF -MINE MINING PLAN <br />FOR THE NEW HORIZON MINING AREA ......................... 2.05.6(3) -17 <br />TABLE 2.05.6.(3) -2 <br />Water Quality Comparison - Overburden Water (GW -N9) vs. Spoil Water (Spoil Spring) <br />........................... ............................... 2.05.6(3) -29 <br />TABLE 2.05.6.(3) -3 <br />Flow Rates vs. TDS for Selected Surface Water Locations <br />Overburden Wells GW -N9 and GW -N15 Included for Comparison ...... 2.05.6(3) -31 <br />TABLE 2.05.6.(3) -4 <br />Flow Rates vs. TDS for Spoil Waters and Receiving Streams ........... 2.05.6(3) -38 <br />REVISED MAY 2010 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.