My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:26 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 10:19:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/25/2010
Doc Name
Response 1 Revised Pages Section 2.05.4(2)(d)
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
through the Prime Farmland Soil Lift A horizon. The only concern one would ever have is the <br />operational possibility of pulling up chunks of frozen Lift A and B topsoil together with <br />equipment because of the frost. One wouldn't want to dilute topsoil Lift A with big chunks of <br />topsoil Lift B. For a single lift topsoil removal or a mixed topsoil stripping situation, then that <br />concern goes away. It should be noted that New Horizon stacks Lift A, Lift B and Mixed topsoil <br />into separate but large piles with a dozer. The larger the topsoil pile, the more dirt insulation <br />there is protecting the interface to Lift B directly under the pile. The conclusion is, that stripping <br />(dozing, load, haul, dump, and regrading) topsoil in freezing conditions is perfectly acceptable <br />at the New Horizon Mine. By the rare chance there is a micro occurrence of an extremely sub <br />freezing period of time, for many weeks, the actual rip, doze and stacking of any Lift A will be <br />curtailed but stacking of Lift B or Mixed topsoil could continue. Finally, there would be a high <br />probability the dozer(s) wouldn't be able to start or operate under those extreme freezing <br />conditions anyway. <br />8.11 Stripping Saturated Topsoil <br />The scanned Table 2.05.4(2)(d) -1A from the Natural Resources Conservation Service -Soil <br />Survey of San Miguel Area, Colorado, pg 197 shows the average monthly precipitation from <br />1961 -1990 for Uravan ,Colorado area, which is near Nucla. The monthly average ranges from <br />0.62 " - 1.53" per month. The yearly average is only 12.60" of precipitation per year. WFC just <br />doesn't see a problem with the ground getting saturated beyond a couple inches by rainfall, at <br />any one time. The average snowfall per month as seen in Table 2.05.4(2)(d) -1A is also <br />insignificant for the Nucla area. As mentioned above, Lift A, Lift B and Mixed topsoil will be <br />piled up using a dozer. So after the dozer gets past the first couple of inches, if that, of rain <br />soaked topsoil, he will be in the dry. No significant problem as far as precipitation soaked soils. <br />The likely hood of a dozer working during a severe thunderstorm stacking topsoil is remote. <br />Operationally, that dozer would be pulled out of that work duty to assist the other mining <br />operations such as clearing roads so coal haulage out of the pit could continue. As far as <br />loading, hauling and spreading the topsoil after it has been stacked by the dozer is nothing to <br />be concerned about either. The outer 2 -3" of the pile may be damp but not the interior. Again, <br />no worries or chances of any significant mixing of Lift A with Lift B because after Lift A is <br />(Revised October 2009) 2.05.4(2)(d) -32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.