My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-05-25_REVISION - C1981008 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:12:26 PM
Creation date
5/26/2010 10:19:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/25/2010
Doc Name
Response 1 Revised Pages Section 2.05.4(2)(d)
Type & Sequence
PR6
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Parameter Units <br />Prime Farmland <br />Lift B-A <br />Prime Farmland <br />Sinale Lift Soils <br />Lift Aand- Sin - <br />LiftB <br />Calcium carbonate <br />>15% <br />>40% <br />_ <br />percentage 15% <br />( <br />°/ <br />) <br />Sekn uni (p ri)�.2 <br />pp <br />Particle size <br />All soil textures except: s, Is, sc, sic, c <br />Boron tonl tested <br />wherever Bench 1 <br />material is - <br />used as suitable Prime <br />not tested <br />55�m <br />not tested <br />Farmland Lift B) <br />Coarse fragments ( °k) ° - <br />>15% <br />>10% 3" diam. + <br />>35% one location- <br />�109b-3 -diam 0 <br />( >25% average) <br />>35 % average <br />Sam le Site Frequenc <br />1 er 2.5 acres <br />1 per 2.5 acres <br />1 per 5 acres <br />This table is slightly different than the suitability table enclosed in Section 2.04.9 for the pre - <br />mine soils investigation. <br />' The threshold levels are to be used as a guide in evaluating the suitability of a soil material for reclamation. An <br />evaluation should take into account the 'total system ". Interactive parameters may either nullify or verify the <br />significance of a potential problem. <br />' The actual maximum acceptable salt level will depend on the plant species proposed in the revegetation plan and <br />the potential for upward salt movement. As pointed out in the Seltzer report in Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d) -f-4, Dave <br />Dearstyne of the NRCS said that a level of 6.0 in the subsoil would not be detrimental to grasses or alfalfa. A study <br />done by Curtis Swift, PhD, of Colorado State University (Attachment 2.05.4(2)(d) -2), tilled Salt Tolerance of Various <br />(Revised October 1009) 205.4(2)(d) -20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.