Laserfiche WebLink
p.8 <br />. . F <br />r <br />BACK TO CROPS. Our Lease agreement also states that. We will not except any less that what <br />we had. <br />So, they think they are following the rules and regulations and protecting the landowner. HOW? <br />Thank you for your consideration and will look forward to hearing from you and speaking with <br />you. All we ever wanted was to have our property put back as good as it was prior to the mine <br />entering the property. Remove the soil, take their coal, put our soils back. Why do all of you <br />make it so hard and why couldn't the State just make WFC do that? Why was it so hard for <br />WFC to just remove our soils, they knew it was prime farmland and had been told for years prior <br />to them even signing the lease. Remove our soils in the 2 lifts that they had been doing, take <br />their coal, put our soils back as Lance agreed and we were all told and follow right behind the <br />mine as we were told and had always done, reclaim it and go on with our lives. WHY? WHY <br />did the State not protect us? Why should we have to object? WHY? The laws are fairly simple <br />and straight forward, so why add things and make it complicated? Come and let us show you <br />how they have started putting it back. The rocks that we asked them to make sure were not there <br />are there.. The slope already 7 feet higher than what we had. We cannot ever IRRIGATE like <br />we were. All of you think wow they are going to put side rolls. We already had siderolls long <br />before western fuels and we had other means of irrigating, to RAISE CORN. HOW DO YOU <br />RAISE CORN UNDER A SIDE ROLL???. And, Western Fuels wanted to furnish the USE OF <br />THE USE of three siderolls. We have already spent thousands on irrigating equipment and we <br />had all of it in place to RAISE EVERYTHING WE NEEDED TO RAISE. To conditions as <br />good as or better, how is having to figure out how to irrigate again after bond release when there <br />will be NO SYSTEMS to irrigate with. THE USE OF. This was never agreed upon and will not <br />be accepted. The systems we used can never be used again because of the way they are putting it <br />back. TODAYS things. I would like to see a copy of this prime farmland investigation that was <br />NEVER done and by whom was it done????" The fanner was NEVER talked to and EVER.ONE <br />in this country knows that we raised crops for sell and have long before the lease was signed. <br />WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO GO AN GET A LETTER FROM EVERY FARMER IN THIS <br />COUNTRY???? I HAVE SENT Marcia a copy of all of them signing it stating we have always <br />raised alfalfa and we have always had sufficient water. It was signed by Weimers, Coopers, <br />Gabriels, Olivers, Carvers, Galleys, Richards and Richards, and everyone in this area. What <br />happened to that letter? It was certified 2 years ago and sent to Marcia. <br />Jim Boyd from NRCS said if 7.4 was the criteria for Prime Farm <br />land, that there would be No prime farmland in the entire state. In this so called prime farmland <br />investigation in 1998, why was MRCS never called? <br />Kinda funny isn't it? They use Jim Boyd or Mr. Dearstyne every ter, minutes for everything else <br />but this so called investigation that was never done, they didn't make one call, they didn't get one <br />letter. Instead they took the letter of Dean Stindts that I sent you and DISQUALIFIED EVERY <br />ACRE OF BARX SOILS IN THIS ENTIRE AREA WITH FALSE DOCUMENTATION! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! <br />WHY ARE YOU ALLOWING THIS?? WHY WOULD THE STATE OR FEDERAL <br />GOVERNMENT ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN??? You have it now in your possession, read for <br />% <br />? r ?t c7 ??: ? cl/ ?y •----