Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Gary D. Witt <br />July 30, 2009 <br />Page 5 <br />up must be submitted to the Water Commissioner, Division Engineer and the State <br />Engineer as part of the documentation process. <br />21. The Applicant shall perform an inspection and provide verification for all parcels of dried <br />up land used to generate augmentation credits during the term of this SWSP. The <br />Water Commissioner shall be notified of the date of inspection and provided the <br />opportunity to accompany the Applicant during this inspection. The final verification of <br />dry up will be in the form of an affidavit signed by an individual having personal <br />knowledge of the dry up for plan year's entire irrigation season for each parcel of land <br />used in this SWSP. The applicant shall provide all affidavits to the division engineer by <br />September 1, 2009 in order that the final determination of augmentation credits for the <br />irrigation season can be made along with mapping showing any revisions to the dry up <br />acreage. The applicant shall modify accounting to reflect that the credit from any <br />dry-up fields containing alfalfa or native grass will be assessed in the following manner: <br />(a) For fields deep tilled or chemically treated to successfully kill alfalfa or native <br />grass, 100% credit will be given for consumptive use as otherwise computed <br />under the conditions of this approval. <br />(b) For fields not deep tilled or chemically treated to successfully kill alfalfa, records <br />of monthly monitoring of depth to groundwater at existing irrigation wells or <br />existing or new monitoring wells or piezometers within %.-mile of each alfalfa or <br />native grass field must be maintained. Credits will be reduced according to the <br />following table when depth to groundwater is less than the depth assumed to <br />provide no significant contribution to alfalfa growth. Measurements taken at the <br />start of each month will determine the necessary reduction in credit to be applied <br />during the following month. The Applicant may use another methodology upon <br />review and approval by the State Engineer and Division Engineer. <br />Depth to Ground Percent Reduction in CU Credit' <br />Water (Feet) <br />Native Grass <br />Alfalfa <br />1 85% 100% <br />2 50% 90% <br />3 30% 75% <br />4 20% 50% <br />5 15% 35% <br />6 10% 20% <br />7 5% 15% <br />8 0% 10% <br />1. Adapted from EVAPOTRANSPIRATION AND AGRONOMIC RESPONSES IN FORMERLY IRRIGATED <br />MOUNTAIN MEADOWS, South Park, Colorado, March 1, 1990; Revised September 1, 1991 <br />22. The dry year analysis required by this office for a permanent plan for augmentation may <br />vary from the analysis approved in this substitute water supply plan. Approval of this <br />substitute water supply plan shall have no precedentiai or evidentiary force, does not <br />constitute an admission or statement of position in any other proceeding, and shall not <br />imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law contained herein, or <br />with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />23. All releases of replacement water must be sufficient to cover all out of priority depletions <br />and be made under the direction and/or approval of the Water Commissioner. The <br />replacement may be aggregated to maximize beneficial use. The Water Commissioner <br />and/or Division Engineer shall determine the rate and timing of an aggregated release.