Laserfiche WebLink
? t 4SS cgv <br />Seneca Coal Company <br />CON Company <br />May 13, 2010 <br />RECENED <br />Mr. Dan Mathews <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety MAY 17x,010 <br />101 South 3rd, Suite 301 <br />Grand Junction, CO 81501 aivta?pfng and SSa n'-Iy ?, <br />(970) 243-1571n'tng and <br />RE: Seneca II-W (Permit No. C-1982-057) <br />Technical Revision No. (TR-68), Permanent Light-Use Road Documentation <br />Response to Adequacy Comments <br />Mr. Mathews, <br />Seneca Coal Company (SCC) has reviewed your preliminary adequacy review letter dated January 5, 2010 and <br />has developed the following responses. <br />1. "Shop and Storage Area" was deleted f vm amended Attachment 20-2 Table of Contents, and from the listing of <br />0 Permanent Features/Structures on page 20-2.1. The cornspondng section was also deleted from the body of the <br />Attachment narrative on page 20-2.3. However, then is reference to postmining retention of the shop facility under the <br />Access Load `A"narrative, `Powerlirre and Substation "narratnx, and the light Use Road 2 (LU-2) narrative <br />The Sbop and Storage Area is also listed as a Requested permanent feature in the SCC landowner letter in Appendix <br />20-2.1, and it depicted on Exhibit 20-2 `Postmining Topography and Drainage Map" We note that although the <br />Table of Contentspage and page 20-2.1 of the submittal are marked as having originated with 7R-67 in 01/09, they <br />diierfmm the currently approved versions of these pages, which are also marked V1109 "and "TR-62" It would <br />appear to be possible that a preliminary version of the TR-62 pages was inadvertently updated for the TR-68 submittal, <br />rather than the final approved version of T&68. <br />Please clarify whether it is SCC's intent to retain the Shop and Storage Ana as a permanent featum. If the shop area <br />will not be retained, it is not clear whether them would be reason to retain the Shop Well, LU-2, or the Powerline from <br />the Substation to the shop (and associated segment of LU-1). Please address these questions and revise <br />the appropriate sections ofAttachment 20-2 text, Appendix 20-2.1, and Exhibit 20-2 as <br />appropriate to be intemaUy consistent: <br />Response: The requested changes to Tab 20 text, Attachment 20-2 text, Appendix 20-2.1 and Exhibit 20-2 <br />show that the Shop and Storage Area are to remain as permanent facilities have been made in the attached <br />package. <br />2. The fart sentence of the third paragraph on page 20-2.1 (1 andowner Access Road Documentation) is an incomplete <br />sentence fragment. The comsponding sentence on the currently approved version of the page is a complete sentence, which <br />• would seem topoint to theponibility noted in Items, that apmliminary version ofpage 20-2.1 was inadvertently <br />updated for TR-68, rather than the approved version.