My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-06_REVISION - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-04-06_REVISION - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:03:26 PM
Creation date
4/30/2010 9:49:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
4/6/2010
Doc Name
Supplemental Adequacy Review and Follow-up to Informal Conference
From
DRMS
To
Western Fuels Colorado
Type & Sequence
PR6
Email Name
MLT
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C- 1981 -008 PR -06 <br />PAR — Supplemental <br />06- Apr -2010 <br />Page 7 of 7 <br />New Horizon Mine Permit Area. With PR -06, the title of Table 2.04.3 -1 has been <br />changed to "Pre -Mine Land use, Areas by Type ". Please correct these two references on <br />Page 2.04.3 -9 of the redline version. <br />83. During the Informal Conference, Mike Morgan commented that the elevation of the <br />reclaimed northern end of the Benson -West property is higher than the pre- mining <br />elevation was, blocking the view to the North from "Sunshine Corner ". During the <br />discussion on 16 March, WFC indicated that, at Mr. Morgan's request, the reclaimed <br />elevations of the Morgan parcel will be such that a pivot system could one day be used to <br />cover both mined and un -mined portions of his property. The increase in backfill volume <br />(swell) that would otherwise have occurred on the reclaimed Morgan property has thus <br />been transferred to the Benson and Lloyd parcels. The text of the Permit does not reflect <br />this information. Please revise Section 2.05.4(2)(c) Backfill and Grading to explain the <br />increased post- mining elevations proposed for the Lloyd and Benson -West parcels. <br />84. At the informal conference and in correspondence, Mike Morgan also expressed concern <br />about the possibility of spoil springs developing on the property to the north of the <br />Morgan property. Please evaluate the possibility of spoil springs developing and <br />discharging as a result of the elevation changes which could impact water quantity and <br />water quality. This discussion should be added to the discussion of Probable Hydrologic <br />Impacts. <br />Please provide responses to this letter and the January 22, 2010 initial PAR by April 19, 2010. <br />Pursuant to Rule 2.07.4(2), the Division is required to make a proposed decision no later than 60 <br />days after the informal conference which is April 19, 2010. For good cause shown, the Division <br />may extend the time for the proposed decision up to an additional 60 days. Please request a 60- <br />day extension to the proposed decision deadline. <br />If you have any questions, please contact me. <br />Sincerely, <br />Marcia L. Talvitie, P.E. <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />CC. Sandy Brown <br />Dan Mathews <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.