Laserfiche WebLink
However, Wildcat has extended the comment period to May 6, which is also the Division's deadline for a <br />decision on the application. As described below, this generous extension of the comment period has created a <br />problem with the review process, which may be resolved by Wildcat requesting an extension to the decision <br />date. <br />2) Pursuant to Rule 1.7.1(3), the Division must forward copy of all timely objections to the Applicant within 10 days <br />of receipt. If an objecting party raises a jurisdictional issue, not previously addressed in the application, the <br />Applicant must revise the application accordingly. This must occur prior to the decision date. If, by the decision <br />date, the Applicant has failed to demonstrate that the application meets the minimum requirements of the Act, <br />Rules and Regulations, the Division will deny the application. Under the current scenario, whereby the decision <br />date occurs on the close of the comment period, it is possible for the Division to deny the application based on a <br />timely objection which Wildcat has not yet received or had time to address. <br />Therefore, the Division recommends that Wildcat requests no less than a 10-day extension to the decision <br />deadline, preferably to a date beyond May 16, as sufficient to ensure not only time for the Division to forward <br />all timely comments to the Applicant, but also ensure ample time for the Applicant to respond to the <br />jurisdictional comments and finalize the demonstrations that the application meets the minimum requirements <br />of the Act, Rules and Regulations. <br />The sixth attached file is a photo of the notice (sign) posted at the mine site, supposedly in accordance with Rule <br />1.6.2(1)(b). Clearly, this sign is a copy of the newspaper notice required by Rule 1.6.2(1)(d) and not what is required by <br />1.6.2(1)(b). However, the newspaper notice provides more information than required by 1.6.2(1)(b) and as such, had <br />the posted notice provided the correct information, the switch may have been acceptable. But it did not. <br />As shown in the photo, the notice posted at the mine site identifies the Applicant as Mike Clements and states that the <br />public comment period will close on April 1. As indicated on pages one, two and seven of the application form, the <br />Applicant is "Wildcat Mining Corporation". As noticed by Wildcat (attached Word documents) the public comment <br />period will not close until May 6. Therefore, the notice (sign) posted at the mine site is in error and a correct notice <br />must be re-posted in accordance with the requirements of Rule 1.6.2(1)(b). Pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(b), the Applicant <br />must provide a signed affidavit that such notice (sign) has been posted. This new posting and affidavit will represent the <br />third attempt at this notice. <br />Wally <br />From: George Robinson [mailto:georgerobinson@R2INCORPORATED.COM] <br />Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 5:57 PM <br />To: Erickson, Wally <br />Cc: Mike Clements <br />Subject: RE: Mayday Mine-Wildcat Mining Corporation -Adajacent Landowner Notification Certified Receipts <br />All letters and notices to the adjacent landowners is attached for your review. Thanks <br />George M.L. Robinson <br />R Squared, Inc. <br />9034 East Easter Place, Suite 201 <br />Centennial, Colorado 80112 <br />303.832.7664 <br />303. 832.7469 (f) <br />cell 720.641.2534 <br />The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended <br />only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any