My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-20_REVISION - M1977300 (9)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977300
>
2010-04-20_REVISION - M1977300 (9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:08:26 PM
Creation date
4/22/2010 3:28:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977300
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/20/2010
Doc Name
12-20
From
Whetstone
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
TR11
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Environmental Protection Plan, Schwartzwalder Mine 15-7 <br />• Preliminary design considerations for the funnel and gate PRB installation for the Schwartzwalder Mine <br />include the system location, aquifer thickness, groundwater velocity, and groundwater geochemistry. The <br />most practical and cost effective location is downgradient (east) of Sump 1, where the valley narrows and <br />the alluvium is constricted. Groundwater currently daylights at ground surface, because flow in the aquifer <br />exceeds the carrying capacity of the aquifer at this bottleneck. Here, the width of the caisson funnel would <br />be 60 feet for full capture of the aquifer. An asymmetrical wingwall (longer on the north [creekside] than <br />on the south [hillside]) would effectively funnel groundwater into the gate, while isolating the system from <br />surface water. <br />Aquifer calculations for the preliminary design were based on two different hydraulic conductivity values: <br />9.88x10"3 cm/sec from single well tests conducted by HydroGeo in 1982 and 6.0x10"3 cm/sec from a <br />multiple well aquifer pumping test conducted by Adrian Brown Consultants in 1999. Assuming a 17-ft <br />thick aquifer (based on drilling records from adjacent wells), a hydraulic gradient equivalent to the surface <br />gradient, and a porosity of 0.15, the natural flow velocity (Darcy velocity) ranges from 4.0 to 6.7 ft/day, <br />and the aquifer transmits 3.2 to 5.5 gpm at the considered location. Groundwater velocity is an important <br />factor in the design of the system, because high groundwater velocities require larger reactive cells to <br />achieve adequate residence times. <br />Table 15-1. Aquifer Properties for Preliminary Pl4B Design <br /> Hydraulic Conductivity Hydraulic Conductivity <br />Units <br /> from ABC from HydroGeo <br />Len Y-th 1 to GW flow) 60 <br />60 <br />.................. <br />ft <br />.................... <br /> <br />Aquifer thickness <br />.......................................... <br /> <br /> <br />...................._. <br />.....................................................................1_? <br /> <br />17 <br />_ ....................................... ft <br />....................................... <br />Aquifer hydraulic 6.00E-03 9.88E-03 cm/sec <br />conductivity <br />................................................................... <br />.........,......................................................... .......... <br />............................................... <br />• Aquifer hydraulic <br />17.0 <br />28.0 <br />ft/day <br />conductivity <br />... .......... _................................................................................................................................. ..................................................... <br />........................ <br />.... _..... <br />.................-............... .................. <br />...._ <br />Porosity <br />............... 0.15 <br />........... 0.15 <br />................................ <br />. .........................- <br />.......................................................... <br />..... <br />Hydraulic gradient 0.0357 0.0357 <br />Flow volume 620 <br />................................................................................... 1020 <br />....................................................................................................................... ft3/day <br />........ .... <br />.......................................................................................................... <br />Flow volume ....................................................... <br />3.22 <br />.... ...................................... 5.30 <br />....................................... <br />.. ;.......................................................... ........ gpm <br />...... . <br />....................................................... .... . _. <br />Flow volume ............... ............. .......................... . <br />0.007 <br />0.012 cfs <br />Flow velocity (natural) 4.05 6.67 ft/day <br />The capital cost of installing a permeable barrier includes the following items: <br />• Cost of the reactive medium (ZVI) <br />• Cost of the emplacement (funnel and gate caissons) <br />• Technology licensing costs <br />• Cost of disposal of spoils and restoration of ground surface (assumed surface disposal and backfill <br />acceptable, no offsite disposal required). <br />The preliminary design for the Schwartzwalder funnel and gate PRB system assumed a 10 ft x 10 ft x 17ft <br />deep PRB gate, with a 50-ft funnel (60 total width), as shown in Figure 15-2. Construction of the funnel <br />and gate would include the following components: <br />o Pre-excavate the alignment of the funnel and gate down to 10 feet from the ground surface. <br />o Install sealable sheet piling (Waterloo Barrier system). Gate formed by a cofferdam. <br />o Seal the funnel and gates. <br />o Cofferdam will be excavated and supported in order to accommodate the loading of the reactive <br />• media. <br />o Place the reactive media into the excavated cofferdam. <br />4109C.100419 Whetstone Associates
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.