My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2010-04-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:08:18 PM
Creation date
4/19/2010 1:54:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/19/2010
Doc Name
Citizens Complaint
From
Scott Collignon
To
DRMS
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UJ1.19.. <br />4/16/10 pt <br />Scott Collignon <br />4495 County Road 124 <br />Hesperus, Co. 81326 <br />970-385-4383 <br />To The Colorado DRMS Board, <br />Jt- ?Rql-135 <br /> <br />{ : . 3 v +a <br /> <br /> <br />This letter is in response to the Public Notice printed in the Durango Herald Newspaper <br />concerning the filling for Wildcat Mining's permit application dated 4/16/10. <br />My concerns are as follows: I see the permit is for the Mayday Mine. What about the <br />adjoining Idaho Mine's illegal and unpermitted mill which was on the initial permit? <br />This should be included in the disturbed area and thus a 110 permit is not warranted and a <br />112 permit should be required. <br />I also feel that Wildcat's permit should include the latest documented work (last <br />inspection report) of a new portal and an illegal mill which created yet more disturbed <br />area around this site. <br />Further more, let's not forget the access road data from Wally Erickson's last inspection <br />report. He reiterates that the access road either needed to be reclaimed or reconstructed. <br />In order to comply this road needed to be lengthened to bring it to the proper grade. <br />Lengthening this road would create yet more disturbed area. You need to look at this <br />project as a 112 project with all these future modifications that are required. <br />A final note it's stated in the public notice the final use of the land will be recreation. <br />This is an extremely bold statement for a company that is rentin the land. I feel this is a <br />"tell them what the want to bear approach" I am fiercely apposed to this project and <br />request party status. <br />Sincerely; <br />Scott Collignon
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.