My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Minerals
>
M1981185
>
2010-04-19_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - M1981185
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:08:18 PM
Creation date
4/19/2010 1:54:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981185
IBM Index Class Name
GENERAL DOCUMENTS
Doc Date
4/19/2010
Doc Name
Citizen Complaint
From
Lisa Giovanniello
To
DRMS
Email Name
WHE
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
UAL <br />M- loksi - )S5 ? <br />4116/10 / ? .` 9 N <br />V X17 ?YI"J'is a'p -9 Sf.t yy?.. <br />Lisa Giovanniello <br />4557 County Road 124 ` <br />Hesperus, Co. 81326 <br />970-385-4383 <br />easygogfrontier.net C;irzz-. <br />To the Colorado Division of Mine, Safety, and Reclamation, <br />This letter is in response to the Legal Notice printed in the Durango Herald to submit <br />comments about Wildcat Mining's application for a permit to mine the Mayday mine <br />located in the residential area of Mayday Colorado. I would like to be on record that I am <br />opposed to this project and request Party Status for any further proceedings. <br />My points of contention are multiple. Wildcat Corporation has placed a rock crusher, <br />tailings ponds and slurry equipment on the Idaho Mine property which adjoins the <br />Mayday Mine property. Currently there is a free standing rock crusher, unused tailings <br />ponds full of noxious weeds, fallen trees as pseudo damn, and disturbed dirt around this <br />entire landing. This has never been reclamation and the landing as well as the <br />surrounding area has been severely destroyed. Shouldn't the Idaho be bonded and <br />included in this current permit application? Obviously after 3+ years post disturbance <br />Wildcat has no intention of reclamation this area. The burden will fall on you. <br />The Mayday Mine was created by Wildcat's total disregard for rules and regulations. <br />They continue to be fined and ticketed by multiple government agencies. If permitted <br />they will only continue to push the limits of all entities. I am asking you as a property <br />owner that if you permit this loose company that they are bonded to the highest amount <br />possible. This is not their property, it is leased, and they can't promise you anything. <br />I also feel that prior to any further permits the Wildcat Corporation needs to bring the <br />current bridge to compliance as well as their access road. These both are safety issues <br />that need to be addressed. Currently they have a road that needs to be brought up to code. <br />Remember that an older bridge was torn down and a new bridge was constructed without <br />any proper engineering. The load limit is currently to low for our fire and rescue vehicles <br />to safely cross. <br />Bringing the road to the proper grade will increase the disturbed property and I feel a 112 <br />permit would be what they need. <br />Sincerely: <br />Lisa Giovanniello <br />n
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.