My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-15_HYDROLOGY - M1979191
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Hydrology
>
Minerals
>
M1979191
>
2010-04-15_HYDROLOGY - M1979191
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:04:04 PM
Creation date
4/15/2010 12:11:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1979191
IBM Index Class Name
HYDROLOGY
Doc Date
4/15/2010
Doc Name
Combined Plan
From
OSE
To
Applegate Group, Inc.
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Sira Sartori April 13, 2010 <br />Middle Poudre Combined Plan - Lafarge West, Inc. Page 7 of 8 <br />14. Lafarge, West, Inc. filed for a plan for augmentation for the Port of Entry Pit site in case no. <br />2004CW111 and filed for a plan for augmentation for the Weitzel Pit site in case no. 2002CW205. <br />Lafarge is required to operate the Port of Entry Pit site and the Weitzel Pit site under an SWSP <br />until such time as a decree is entered in case nos. 2004CW111 and 2002CW205. If reclamation <br />of the mines at the Three Bells Pit and Kyger Pit sites produces a permanent water surface <br />exposing groundwater to evaporation, an application for a plan for augmentation must be filed with <br />the Division 1 Water Court at least three years prior to the completion of mining to include, but not <br />be limited to, long-term evaporation losses. If a lined pond results after reclamation, replacement <br />of lagged depletions shall continue until there is no longer an effect on stream flow. Granting of <br />this plan does not imply a position by our office on any litigation associated with case nos. <br />2004CW111 or 2002CW205, or any other case. <br />15. Dewatering at the Three Bells Pit and Shield Mine will produce delayed depletions to the stream <br />system. As long as the pits are continuously dewatered, the water returned to the stream system <br />should be adequate to offset the depletions. However, once dewatering at the sites cease, the <br />delayed, depletions must be addressed. A plan that specifies how the post pumping dewatering <br />depletions (including refilling of the pit) will be replaced, in time, place and amount along with the <br />evaporation from groundwater exposed at the sites after the dewatering stops was presented in <br />the proposed plan. <br />16. If dewatering of the Three Bells Pit or Shield Mine is discontinued, the pits would fill creating <br />additional depletions to the stream system due to increased evaporation. To assure that additional <br />depletions to the river do not occur, a bond for $717,000 for the Kyger Pit, $60,000 for the Three <br />Bells Pit, and $277,500 for the Shields Mine through DRMS has been obtained. Therefore, if the <br />dewatering is discontinued, these bonds can finance the completion of the lining of these pits or <br />the backfilling, thus preventing depletions to the stream system. <br />17. The Shield Mine will be dewatered into the Fossil Creek Reservoir Inlet Ditch. This ditch lies <br />directly to the west of the Shields Mine. The discharge into the Fossil Creek Reservoir Inlet Ditch <br />is the proposed mitigation to address any drawdown impacts from mining in close proximity of the <br />ditch. After subtracting the transit losses (from the Fossil Creek Reservoir Inlet Ditch to the Fossil <br />Creek Reservoir) the dewatering water is measured and returned to the river from the Fossil <br />Creek Reservoir outlet. The releases shall be measured in a manner acceptable to the water <br />commissioner and the division engineer. <br />18. In accordance with amendments to §25-8-202(7), C.R.S., and "Senate Bill 89-181 Rules and <br />Regulations" adopted on February 4, 1992, the State Engineer shall determine whether the <br />substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior appropriators. As such, <br />water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to determine if the water quality is <br />appropriate for downstream water users. <br />19. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall not create <br />any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any pending water court <br />case or any other legal action that maybe initiated concerning this plan. This decision shall not <br />bind the state engineer to act in a similar manner in any other applications involving other plans, <br />or in any proposed renewal of this plan, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact <br />or conclusions of law contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the <br />Applicant.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.