Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br /> MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD <br /> DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br /> IN THE MATTER OF: <br /> Formal Hearing Concerning the FINDINGS OF FACT <br /> Division's Recommendation that CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> the Reclamation Bond for the AND BOARD ORDER <br /> Fruit no. 1 and 2 Mines be <br /> Declared as -Forfeited. <br /> This matter was presented in a hearing, after proper notice, before <br /> the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board ("Board") on March 23, <br /> 1994 in Room 318 of the Centennial Building at 1313 Sherman Street, <br /> Denver, Colorado. The Board conducted the hearing to consider the <br /> Colorado Division of Minerals and Geology's ("Division") <br /> recommendation that the Board declare the reclamation bond for the <br /> Fruita no. 1 and 2 Mines as forfeited. <br /> The hearing .was held in accordance with C.R.S. 34-33-124 (4) and 2 <br /> CCR 407-2, Rule - 3.04.1. A taped transcript was made of the <br /> hearing. .Pursuant to the authority vested in the Board by C.R.S. <br /> 34-33-124(4)- -And' 2. CCR 407--2, -Rule 3.04:1. -the eb <br /> .Board-hery =makes._ <br /> the following. Findings'_of Fact, Conclusions of Law' and Board Order. <br /> Findings of Fact <br /> 1. American Shield Coal Company has- operated the Fruit- No. 1 and <br /> 2 mines since 1986. The operator submitted -a -reclamation plan <br /> for the mine site to the Division on November 20, 1989 in <br /> response to an agreement with the Division. The reclamation <br /> plan was subsequently approved by the Division. <br /> 2. On September 24, 1991, the Division issued Notice of Violation <br /> C-91-024 to the operator for .failure to reclaim to approximate <br /> original -contour and to eliminate all highwalls. The Colorado <br /> Surface Coal Mining Reclamation Act requires that , all <br /> highwalls disturbed- by coal mining operations be eliminated <br /> (Rule- 4.14.1(2) (a),) . <br /> 3. Abatement for NOV C-91-024 was extended for a. period of time <br /> to allow for reconsideration of the reclamation plan by the <br /> Division. During this time, regulation changes were proposed <br /> by the Division for prelaw -highwalls. <br /> 4: NOV C-91-024 was modified to backfill and grade the upper or <br /> Cameo bench so the . hi-ghwalls are completely eliminated. <br /> Abatement for the violation was due on December 14, 1993_ <br />