My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-07_REVISION - C1981019
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-04-07_REVISION - C1981019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:03:33 PM
Creation date
4/9/2010 8:34:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
4/7/2010
Doc Name
Review (Email)
From
Mike Boulay
To
Jim Stark
Type & Sequence
PR3
Email Name
MPB
JRS
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Cc: Brown, Sandy <br />Subject: Colowyo PR-03 Completeness <br />Mike, <br />I have reviewed the Colowyo PR-03 Incompleteness responses and I have the following comments with regards to the <br />questions I asked you to review (questions 6, 7, 8, 9 and 24). <br />Question 6 - This question is a request for a generalized stratagraphic column above and below the coal seams to be <br />mined in the Collom area. Basically, Colowyo states that this is not possible due to the discontinuous nature of the <br />sediments in the Collom area. I guess it is your call as to whether you buy this excuse and we forgo this request, <br />whether we request it again or whether we accept the answer that the "data shows" the generalized column is not <br />possible and review the data during technical adequacy and determine if we agree or not. <br />Question 7 - This question deals with a request for the drill logs for all of the exploration holes in Collom. This is the <br />information you worked with Brandt Dennis to get together last year. Colowyo has provided this information as Exhibit <br />6, Item 10. There is a great deal of information here (it is a binder approximately 3" thick). It looks like what you have <br />requested. I have provided a pdf of the information for one of the holes (06-10). <br />Question 8 - This question dealt with providing the chemical analysis data for the coal seams to be mined. Colowyo has <br />provided this. I think this issue is complete (I have attached their submittal). <br />Question 9 -This question was more a statement regarding the need to restart groundwater monitoring one year prior <br />to commencing the mining operation. I think we keep mentioning this but this item has been addressed. <br />Question 24 -This question dealt with establishing a point(s) of compliance for Collom. Colowyo has provided a 5-page <br />discussion from Brandt Dennis discussing why Colowyo does NOT need a point(s) of compliance for Collom. This is <br />provided in Rule 4, starting on page 14. 1 have also attached this discussion. It appears as though Colowyo has <br />minimally addressed this question. My thought is we will probably review their science and conclusions in technical <br />adequacy. <br />I think that covers all of your questions. Please let me know if you have any questions or need any additional <br />information. <br />James R. Stark <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Colorado Department of Natural Resources <br />Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303-866-3567 X8145 <br />www.mining.state.co.us
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.