My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-05_REPORT - C1982057 (3)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1982057
>
2010-04-05_REPORT - C1982057 (3)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:03:20 PM
Creation date
4/5/2010 2:04:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/5/2010
Doc Name
2009 Annual Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
DTM
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
averaged 0.6, 31.4, 32.0 and 0.2 percent, respectively. Average species density was 21.8 <br />species per 100sq. m. <br />• <br />DISCUSSION <br />Climatic Conditions <br />The year preceding sampling in July 2009 included a dry fall and moderately winter of 2008. The <br />spring and early summer of 2009 was mostly average (Figures 5a and 5b). When compared to <br />other years in which monitoring has occurred back to 1987, the cumulative 12 months total <br />precipitation prior to sampling ranked 2009 near the lower middle of the 23 years of record for <br />April, with total precipitation amounts increasing significantly (to above average amounts) by July <br />(Figures 6a and 6b). Total precipitation for the previous six months was slightly above average <br />for the period of record back to 1987 for the month of July (Figure 7a and 7b). The cumulative <br />four month precipitation values back to 1987 (Figure 8b) show that 2009 was still slightly above <br />the 23-year average. With regard to temperature, cumulative January through June 2009 warmth <br />was above average (Figure 9). <br />Assessment of BRB for Compliance with Phase ll Performance Standards <br />• The data from 2009 sampling of a potential Phase Bond Release Block application satisfied <br />hypothesis testing of the proposition that BRB allowable herbaceous cover exceeded 90% of the <br />standard (31.1% allowable cover). The figure for allowable cover in the 2009 Phase II BRB <br />(46.3%) is the result of subtracting tree, shrub and non-herbaceous cover and perennial noxious <br />weed cover and "excess annual/biennial cover" (which includes the non-allowable cover by <br />houndstongue, Canada thistle and bull thistle) from the observed first-hit total vegetation cover. <br />A reverse t-test of the assertion that the 2009 Phase II BRB allowable cover is indistinguishable <br />from 90% of the standard is as follows: <br />tc =(46.3-31.1)/(13.6/sgrt 60)=8.6 <br />Since critical t = 0.848 (one-tailed, alpha = 0.2, 59 do and t, is greater than this critical value, <br />reclamation success for Phase II is demonstrated. <br />Woody Plant Density <br />Figure 2 graphically presents "background" shrub density averages for the reclaimed area <br />• sampled in 2009. As can be seen, the 2009 sampling area exceeds the overall average density <br />requirement of >_ 180 (90% of 200) stems per acre. Although no shrub concentration areas have <br />12
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.