My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-04-05_REPORT - C1980005
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1980005
>
2010-04-05_REPORT - C1980005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:03:19 PM
Creation date
4/5/2010 1:45:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
4/5/2010
Doc Name
2009 Annual Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Email Name
DTM
SB1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
90
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• During the course of the fieldwork, a list of all plant species encountered (quantitative plus <br />incidental observations) was compiled for the reclamation area and the two reference areas. <br />These lists are summarized in Appendix 2, Species Presence for All Areas, which includes <br />current nomenclature and cross-references to older nomenclature. Note that all big sagebrush <br />plants encountered were referred to as Seriphidium tridentatum. Plants referred to here as Poa <br />secunda are the plants formerly known as big bluegrass (Poa ampla) that were included in the <br />seed mixes as such. The taxonomic treatment of Weber and Wittmann (1996) places Poa ampla <br />(as well as Poa sandbergii) with Poa secunda. Despite this merger, the distinctness of Poa <br />ampla is worth noting. <br />Photographic Record <br />Within each reclamation and reference area, representative color photographs were taken to <br />document the appearance of the vegetation in 2009 (Appendix 4). Within each reclaimed area <br />photograph, a placard identifies the particular area and sample. <br />Statistical Methods <br />Sampling was conducted at randomly located sites. Random map points for sampling locations <br />were generated randomly using ESRI ArcMap 9.3 software and Hawth's Analysis Tools for <br />ArcGIS (Beyer 2004). Garmin GPS60 units (accuracy to 3 m) and topographic maps were used in <br />the field to locate random points. Cover and woody plant density transects were randomly <br />oriented; production samples were located randomly behind the transect origin. At each <br />cover/woody plant density sampling location, the slope, expressed as a percent, and aspect of <br />the site, in degrees not corrected for magnetic declination, were determined and recorded, as <br />was the orientation of the transect. <br />Assessment of Reclamation Adequacy <br />GENERAL <br />Formal (statistical) hypothesis testing (see below) was undertaken for the Phase II Bond Release <br />Block (post-law, Permanent program lands). <br />SAMPLE ADEQUACY DETERMINATION <br />After fifteen (15) cover samples in a BRB or reference area, sample adequacy was evaluated <br />based on total live foliar cover by vascular plants using the following expression: <br />• 4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.