Laserfiche WebLink
• success would be tested using a parametric test of the "reverse null" hypothesis. This would be <br />conducted using the following expression (CDMG 2003 proposed rules revisions, 4.15.11 (2)(c)): <br />x-Q <br />tc _ <br />S- <br />x <br />Where: Y = Bond Release Block Sample Mean <br />Q = 90% of Standard <br />] <br />S- = Standard error of mean [ s / V n <br />X <br />S = Sample standard deviation <br />n = Sample size <br />t. = Calculated t value <br />tt = Table t value (alpha = 0.2) <br />The (reverse) null hypothesis being tested would be that the bond release block mean (µ) was <br />less than or equal to 90% of the standard, stated as Ho: g<_ Q. If t, was greater than the 1-tailed t <br />table value for alpha error probability of .20, with (n-1) degrees of freedom then Ho would be <br />• rejected, and revegetation would be deemed successful. <br />Were the mean allowable herbaceous cover of an adequate sample from the 2009 Phase II BRB <br />less than 90% of the cover standard (see above), then a one-sample West would be made in the <br />following form to test the hypothesis of reclamation success for cover, (CDMG 2003 proposed <br />rules revisions, 4.15.11 (2)(b)): <br />t = Q-x <br />S- <br />x <br />Where: x = Bond Release Block Sample Mean <br />Q = 90% of Standard <br />S- = Standard error of mean [slI ] <br />X <br />S = Sample standard deviation <br />n = Sample size <br />tc = Calculated t value <br />tt = Table t value (alpha = 0.1) <br />• 7