My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
General Documents
>
Coal
>
C1981008
>
2010-03-26_GENERAL DOCUMENTS - C1981008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:02:41 PM
Creation date
4/1/2010 10:13:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
General Documents
Doc Date
3/26/2010
Doc Name
Intent to File a Civil Suit
From
JoEllen Turner
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
General Correspondence
Email Name
SB1
MLT
DAB
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
167
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LETTER FROM THE DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINES, AND <br />(• SAFETY <br />This letter indicates to us that the Director nor the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety <br />has even read the Permit - Revision #6 and if they have, they do not understand any of it. <br />(1) The Last date of the Public Notices was in fact, December 31, 2009, which means that the <br />Public comment period would be through January 30, 2010. If they were involved, they would <br />have seen that the map that was suppose to be included in their publication was left out and <br />therefore, they published another week ending on December 31, 2009. <br />(2) The Director states that WFC proposes to install three permanent siderolls, which in fact <br />WFC proposes THE USE OF 3 siderolls for the reclamation period as well as the irrigation pipe. <br />The use of only through reclamation. <br />(3) The director states that these are to irrigate 60 acres which our property was historically <br />irrigated since 1959 and are prime farmlands not just prime soils. According to the application, <br />she states that None of the Morgan property are to be reclaimed as DRYLAND. Now, does this <br />tell everyone that this lady has not read any of this? DRYLAND AND POTENTIAL <br />CROPLAND ARE THE SAME THING! ! ! ! ! THIS WAS A FANCY TERMINOLOGY TO NOT <br />SCARE EVERYONE RIGHT OFF THE BAT. DRYLAND AND POTENTIAL CROPLAND <br />ARE THE SAME THING! ! !! ! ! <br />(4)The Morgan Property has been historically irrigated since 1959 and IT is PRIME <br />FARMLAND NOT JUST PRIME SOILS! ! ! ! ! The entire Morgan Property will be returned to <br />the irrigated condition it was prior to the mine entering the property. The DRMS has used the <br />NRCS letters incorrectly, AGAIN! ! ! ! <br />0' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.