My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (94)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-12-17_REVISION - C1981019 (94)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:28:07 PM
Creation date
3/30/2010 10:14:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
12/17/2010
Doc Name
Exhibit 23 Item 1 Geotechnical Report -Collom Temporary Spoil Pile & Pond
Type & Sequence
PR3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
128
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
SHANNON 6WILSON. INC. <br />deposits in the valley to thin and grade into thinner colluvial deposits on the slopes above the <br />flatter valley floor. The estimated width of the deeper soil deposits in the valley floor ranges <br />from about 150 to 200 feet. <br />The bedrock consisted of very low to moderate strength interbedded sandstone and claystone. <br />Our experience at the mine indicates it is not uncommon for a relatively thin carbonaceous <br />mudstone (CMS) or carbonaceous shale (CS) layer to be present below coal seams. These layers <br />represent the weaker rock types with respect to shear strength that are commonly found in this <br />bedrock formation at the Colowyo mine. The CMS or CS layers are typically 1 to 2 feet thick <br />but can be thinner or thicker. <br />Groundwater was measured at depths of approximately 16 to 22 feet below the existing ground <br />surface during drilling in borings C- 101,103 and 104. Boring C -102, located further from the <br />creek, was dry. It should be noted that groundwater conditions during drilling are not a static <br />measurement, but rather reflect short-term conditions. Groundwater fluctuations may occur <br />depending on the time of the year and local conditions particular to the site. <br />We reviewed a seep and spring survey by Greystone Environmental Consultants, Inc. (2003). <br />This report indicates that three seeps /springs are located within the proposed footprint of the <br />spoil fill. The locations of the mapped seeps and springs are shown in Figure 4. <br />6.0 STABILITY ANALYSIS MODEL AND PARAMETERS <br />The following sections present our method of stability analysis including: <br />• The selection of two basic models to analyze (one with clay at the base and one <br />with CMS /CS at the base) and the geometry of the layers, <br />• Selection of shear strength and density values for the model layers, <br />• Groundwater conditions to be considered, <br />• Selection of pseudo- static acceleration parameters, <br />• Selection of variable combinations of these factors to include in a parametric <br />analysis, and <br />• Evaluation of the results of the stability analysis and development of <br />recommendations. <br />23- 1- 01101- 400- R1.docx/wp /Ikn <br />0 <br />23 -1- 01101 -400 <br />Exh. 23 -1 -13 Revision Date: 08/05/09 <br />Revision No.: PR -03 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.