My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-24_REPORT - C1996084
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1996084
>
2010-03-24_REPORT - C1996084
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:02:32 PM
Creation date
3/29/2010 3:00:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/24/2010
Doc Name
3rd Quarter 2009 Certification of Excess Spoil Fills
From
New Elk Coal Company
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Email Name
KAG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INSPECTION OF EXCESS SPOIL FILL <br />Third Quarter 2009 Certification <br />Fill Area No. 8 <br />Date: September 21, 2009 <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OR REFERENCE TO SITE PLAN: <br />The CTL Thompson report dated April 27, 2001, "Stability Analysis and Geo-technical Recommendations <br />Lorencito Surface Mine Phase r' addresses the general requirements as also cited in Sections 4.09.1 to <br />4.09.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />ACTIVITY DURING INSPECTION: <br />Removal of Topsoil and Organic Matter <br />-Placement of Under-drains <br />-Installation of Surface Drainage System <br />-Construction of Fill <br />-Placement of Topsoil <br />-Seeding <br />X Other Facility idle <br />SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />Sediment pond construction has been completed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by the <br />DMG and as-constructed survey/drawings certified by Registered Land Surveyor and Registered <br />Professional Engineer. All surface run-off from the fill area is directed to this sediment control facility also <br />known as Pond 8. No discharge occurred during the second quarter. <br />SURFACE DRAINAGE <br />Armored Ditches line the east and west boundary of the fill area. Lateral ditches on the fill face direct runoff <br />to these side ditches. No erosional problems were noted along the lateral ditches. Rip-rap in the east <br />armored ditch between the lower and second bench has been repositioned to prevent flow outside of the <br />drainage channel. Slopes have become well vegetated and no other erosional problems were noted. <br />SITE PREPARATION <br />As indicated by previous inspection reports, organic materials such as brush and trees were removed from <br />the proposed fill area followed by topsoil removal prior to fill placement. Design criteria did not require <br />keyway cuts for steeper valleys with minimal soil cover (fill #8). No evidence of springs or seeps was <br />observed during site preparation. <br />DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) <br />Drain sizes are specified by CDMG regulations for fills which can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #8 <br />is a valley fill. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum 6' x 12' triangular section(area = 64 SF) for this <br />size fill. Under-drain system was extended down slope to allow establishing the designed slope criteria for <br />the final slope (assuming no resumption of mining). The typical dimensions of the extended drainage <br />generally were more trapezoidal with a top width of 10', bottom width of 14', and average height of 8' (area <br />> 96 SF). Sandstone recovered from durable "channel" sandstone deposits encountered during the mining <br />process were used in drain construction. Mirafi 160 fabric was used in lieu of filter material.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.