My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-25_PERMIT FILE - M2009094
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Minerals
>
M2009094
>
2010-03-25_PERMIT FILE - M2009094
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:02:36 PM
Creation date
3/29/2010 11:29:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M2009094
IBM Index Class Name
PERMIT FILE
Doc Date
3/25/2010
Doc Name
Second adequacy review letter
From
DRMS
To
Asphalt Constructors, Inc.
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The maximum slope gradient created during all mining phases and the final reclamation slopes will be 3H:1 V. This <br />slope appears adequate for stability during mining and for long-term reclamation. This slope must not be exceeded <br />unless the plan is formally revised. One important reason to maintain this slope is because it affects the bond amount. <br />As such, this will be an item we inspect for in the future. <br />Exhibit R - Proof of Filing Materials at the County Clerk and Recorder (Rule 6.4.18) <br />This exhibit is adequate, in that you have now provided proofs of all filings to-date. Please ensure that you continue to <br />file future application materials and submit to this office the receipts you obtain therefor. This must be received by <br />this office before the decision date. <br />Decision Date <br />The Division's decision date is currently set for April 20, 2010. Please try to respond to all adequacy items included in <br />this letter. All adequacy response materials should be submitted in duplicate and at least several days before the <br />decision date to allow sufficient time to review the materials. <br />I must state that if the application is not adequate for approval by the close of business on the decision date, the <br />application may be denied. If additional time is needed for preparing and submitting your responses, please send me a <br />written request for an extension, specifying the length of additional time needed. <br />Thank you for the quality and timeliness of the adequacy responses you provided. You may send all written materials <br />directly to me, or contact me if there are questions, at the Division's Durango field office: 691 CR 233, Room A-2, <br />Durango, CO 81301; telephone 970-247-5193. <br />Sincerely, <br />Bob Oswald <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />Ec: Steve Shuey, DRMS <br />(cA10-03\aci alamosa 112 adg2/rco)
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.