My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-18_REVISION - M1997032
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1997032
>
2010-03-18_REVISION - M1997032
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:20:47 PM
Creation date
3/25/2010 4:06:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1997032
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/18/2010
Doc Name
Response to Technical Adequacy comments
From
Denison Mines
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
AM1
Email Name
RCO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Resonse to DRMS COmmenlS <br />Enuironmenfa/Pr016dion P/an, <br />Denison Van 4Mine <br />provided to Denison prior to installation of the PVC liner panel. The ore <br />storage pad specifications are attached and provide additional QA/QC <br />requirements. <br />Comment 6 ,411achmenlfl. Comment 1. <br />Denison: In the context of questioning whether uranium should be regarded as a <br />toxic forming material due to its presence at low concentrations, the Applicant <br />states "Denison selected the BLM risk management criteria (RMC)(BLM 2004) <br />to be appropriate criteria for the site based on future land use for the mines. " <br />DRMS response: The BLMpublication "Risk Management Criteria for Metals at <br />BLMMining Sites, Technical Note 390 rev., October 2004, " contains no <br />reference information for uranium. If this is the same document to which the <br />Applicant refers, please elaborate on how the information in this document was <br />extrapolated to risk management of uranium at the Denison sites. <br />Response BLM did not develop RMCs for several metals detected at the Van 4 Mine <br />including uranium. In order to assess the potential toxicity of these metals <br />in development rock and ore, EPA Regional Screening Levels (RSLs) for <br />commercial/ industrial exposure scenario were utilized for the following <br />metals: aluminum, tin, titanium, uranium, and vanadium. This <br />assessment approach is described in Appendix A of the EPP, Section 4.1.3 <br />of the report Evaluation of the Environmental Geochemistnj of the Van 4 Mine. <br />As described in this report, maximum concentrations of these metals did <br />not exceed their respective RSLs, indicating that concentrations of these <br />metals in development rock and ore are not a human health risk via <br />direct contact. <br />Comment 7 4ddendum to the ffydl-olozic Epaltialion. <br />Please provide a figure depicting the 3-dimensional nodal discretization of the <br />UNSAT-H model. <br />Response Agreed. This figure is included in the revised attached calculation brief <br />for the UNSAT-H simulations. <br />References <br />Colorado Lining 2010, www.coloradolining.com <br />Final Van 4 RTC v2 Letter.doc
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.