My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-16_REVISION - M1980178
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980178
>
2010-03-16_REVISION - M1980178
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:55:55 PM
Creation date
3/22/2010 1:43:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980178
IBM Index Class Name
REVISION
Doc Date
3/16/2010
Doc Name
Response to adequacy
From
Thomas A Logue
To
DRMS
Type & Sequence
CN1
Email Name
THM
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
58
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.2 Interior Slopes <br />0 4 � - y Huddteston -Berry <br />� RnYl�srti�.Y t'IafwE LLl <br />• C <br />The slope stability analyses for the interior pit slopes were conducted for the <br />proposed finished slope angle of 3H:1 V. As shown in the results included in Appendix <br />B, the minimum factor -of- safety for the proposed finished interior slopes is 2.6. This is <br />significantly higher than the generally required minimum factor -of- safety of 1.3 to 1.5. <br />5.3 Detention Ponds <br />As shown on Figure 3 — Pond Details, the proposed embankment dams for the <br />detention ponds will be constructed with slopes of 3H:1V. In addition, the dams are <br />proposed to detain a maximum of 4 feet of stormwater. While seepage forces were not <br />considered, a sloping water table was included in the model for conservatism <br />The results of the stability analyses included in Appendix B indicate a minimum <br />factor -of- safety of 1.8 against global stability failure. This is higher than the typically <br />required minimum factor -of- safety of between 1.3 and 1.5 for long -term stability. <br />6.0 CONCLUSIONS <br />Based upon the available data sources, field reconnaissance, and results of the <br />stability analyses, HBET does not believe that there are any geologic conditions which <br />should preclude gravel resource extraction in the western portion of the site. <br />7.0 GENERAL <br />The conclusions included above are based upon the results of the field <br />reconnaissance and on our local experience. These conclusions are valid only for the <br />proposed construction. <br />As discussed previously, the proposed resource extraction in the western portion <br />of the site is not anticipated to adversely impact Highway 141. However, it is <br />recommended that HBET be retained to provide engineering oversight during the mining <br />to verify compliance with the mining plan or permit identification of significant <br />variations in the subsurface conditions which may" require modification of the stability <br />analyses. <br />Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LLC is pleased to be of service to <br />your project. Please contact us if you have any questions or comments regarding the <br />contents of this report. <br />Respectfully Submitted: <br />Huddleston -Berry Engineering and Testing, LL <br />Michael A. Berry, P.E. <br />Vice President of Engineering <br />WA2008 ALL PROJECTS \00966 - Moores Mining, LLC \00966 -0001 Moores Pit\200 - Geo \00966 -0001 R030310.doc 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.