My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-09_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Permit File
>
Coal
>
C1982056A
>
2010-02-09_PERMIT FILE - C1982056A (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 3:59:26 PM
Creation date
3/18/2010 11:13:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056A
IBM Index Class Name
Permit File
Doc Date
2/9/2010
Section_Exhibit Name
2.04 Environmental Resources
Media Type
D
Archive
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The general geology and hydrology of this mining district has been described in previous permitting actions, i.e. <br />original application and updated with PR-3. During 1997 a drilling program was conducted to •fur{her define the <br />geologic setting in the remainder of the EMD. During this program particular attention was given to defining <br />the Wadge seam parting that defines the southem limit of the EMD. Drillholes 97-001 and 97-003 were used to <br />define the southern mining limit. Both of these holes showed an inseam parting of 1.9 - 2.5 feet and thinning of <br />the seam. The overlying stratigraphy is the same as previously discussed. This information was used to finalize <br />the mine plan as presented on Map 23. <br />Drill-site 97-011, which was designed for multiple holes, will be used to provide a better understanding of the <br />fault as it occurs in the North East sub-mains. Three borings were advanced at this location to determine the <br />location and magnitude of the fault. This was done,by advancing two boring on the east side of th'e fault, with <br />each boring intersecting the fault. Another boring was advanced on the west side of the fault into and through <br />~ ,the coal seam. A deviation log was run in each of the holes to allow for accurate placement of end point of <br />boring. This data, along with the other geophysical information, will be used to correlate depth and seam <br />thickness between each boring. After the data is processed, the TCC geologist will be able to provide a better <br />definition of the fault through the sub-mains. TCC is awaiting receipt of the fmal geophysical data •and once <br />available the fault definition process for this azea will be completed. The information will be used to prepare a <br />cut sequence through this area. <br />The expansion of the mine into the remainder of the EMD will see the continued development of the reserves <br />located in the Twentymile Park Basin. As discussed previously, this is an enclosed ground water basin which is <br />rimmed by outcrops of the major lithologic units. The units within this area include the Fish Creek Sandstone (a <br />local sandstone unit), Twentymile Sandstone, Marine shale, Wadge overburden (which includes the Wadge <br />seam), and the Trout Creek Sandstone (which is a marker bed for TCC). TCC has not seen any deviation in the <br />vertical orientation of these units over the entire property, except for displacements caused by faults. <br />As stated above, the Foidel Creek mine is operating in a closed ground water basin. TCC has completed <br />monitoring welts in the following formations within this basin: Twentymile Sandstone, Wadge Overburden, <br />Trout Creel Sandstone and alluvial wells in the alluvium of Foidel, Fish, Middle and Trout creeks. The <br />hydrologic gradients are towards the center of the basin. The EMD will continue mining to the south up dip <br />away from the center of the basin and immediately east of the fault and steep grade zone associated with an <br />anticline. As TCC continues its mining the focus of its hydrologic monitoring program will be on the <br />Twentymile and Trout Creek Sandstones. <br />The EMD fault was first encountered in the 10-Right gateroad and had a displacement of 22 to 23 feet, in the 9 <br />right gateroad the fault had a displacement of 13 to I5.5 feet, in the 8-Right gateroad the fault had a <br />displacement of 8 to 15 feet, in the 7-Right gateroad the fault had a displacement of 8 to 10 feet and in the 6 <br />Right gateroad the fault had a displacement of 13 feet. The faults were relatively dry when encountered and did <br />not yield significant flows to the mine. This is evidenced in the Annual Inflow reports. <br />The mine plan has been designed to eliminate mining through the fault and up the steep grade in longwall panels <br />7-Right through 2-Right. TCC mined through the fault and the steep grade zone in the 9-Right and 8-Right <br />longwall panels before making the decision not to mine through these conditions again. This combination of <br />mining conditions makes it impossible to mine coal in an efficient and economic manner. <br />During the development of the 6-Right gateroad inflows were encountered from the Wadge Overburden <br />between crosscuts 24 to 27. The initial inflow was measured at approximately 265 to 275 gallons per minute. <br />Maximum inflow rates have leveled off to 65 gallons per minute (2001 & 2002 monitoring). The source of the <br />water is-from the roof. No vertical or horizontal offsets were observed; therefore the inflow was not from fault. <br />TCC enlisted the assistance of a consultant (James G. Nalven Consulting) to obtain a better understanding of the <br />reason for the inflow in this area. This is the most water TCC has encountered form a single azea since mining <br />• was initiated in the eazly 1980's. Mr. Nalven visited the mine site on December 2nd and 3rd, 1997, to investigate <br />the source of the inflow. <br />PR06-07 2.04-16.1 11/07/06 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.