Laserfiche WebLink
Andy Rodriguez, P.E. <br />March 17, 2010 <br />Page 4 <br />effect on stream flow. <br />12. Dewatering at this site will produce delayed depletions to the stream system. As long as <br />the pit is continuously dewatered, the water returned to the stream system should be <br />adequate to offset the depletions attributable to the dewatering operation. If dewatering <br />at the site ceases, the delayed depletions must be addressed. At least three years prior <br />to completion of dewatering, a plan must be submitted that specifies how the post <br />pumping dewatering depletions (including refilling of the pit) will be replaced, in time, <br />place and amount. <br />13. To assure that depletions from groundwater evaporation do not occur in the unforeseen <br />event, or events, that would lead to the abandonment of the pit, a bond for $2,653,640 <br />through DRMS for reclamation of the pit has been obtained. Therefore, in case of <br />abandonment the bond can finance the completion of the lining of the pit or the <br />backfilling, thus preventing depletions to the stream system. <br />14. This substitute water supply plan may be revoked or modified at any time should it be <br />determined that injury to other water rights has or will occur as a result of this plan. <br />Should this substitute water supply plan expire without renewal or be revoked prior to <br />adjudication of a permanent plan for augmentation, all excavation of product from below <br />the water table, and all other use of water at the pit, must cease immediately. <br />15. In accordance with amendments to §25-8-202(7), C.R.S., and Senate Bill 89-181 Rules <br />and Regulations adopted on February 4, 1992, the state engineer shall determine <br />whether the.substitute supply is of a quality to meet requirements of use to senior <br />appropriators. As such, water quality data or analysis may be requested at any time to <br />determine if the water quality is appropriate for downstream water users. <br />16. The decision of the state engineer shall have no precedential or evidentiary force, shall <br />not create any presumptions, shift the burden of proof, or serve as a defense in any <br />water court case or any other legal action that may be initiated concerning the substitute <br />water supply plan. This decision shall not bind the State Engineer to act in a similar <br />manner in any other applications involving other plans or in any proposed renewal of this <br />plan, and shall not imply concurrence with any findings of fact or conclusions of law <br />contained herein, or with the engineering methodologies used by the Applicant. <br />Should you have any questions, please contact loana Comaniciu of this office or Mr. Dave <br />Nettles of our Division office in Greeley at (970):352-0742. <br />Sincerely, <br />Kev' 7Rein, P.E. <br />istEngineer <br />"v