Laserfiche WebLink
3.0 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Conclusion <br />Overall the revegetation at Colowyo evaluated by Cedar Creek in 2009 can generally be considered <br />good to very good, and is typical of reclamation efforts at most western coal mines. There were three <br />units (EP042, EP046, and EP047) that had elevated annual brome populations and may require <br />remediation. The latter two units, EP046 and EP047 are fairly new reclamation, year four and year two <br />respectively, so elevated levels of annual species are not an uncommon expectation. However, these <br />units should be closely monitored to ensure that the annual brome populations do not begin to dominate <br />the revegetation. There are areas marked on maps of each corresponding unit that delineates areas with <br />very sparse perennial cover and dominant annual brome populations that may require remediation. Once <br />annual brome populations reach a certain "threshold" level, it becomes very difficult for perennials to out- <br />compete the annuals, especially in the short-term. EP042, however, may be more problematic since it is <br />now in the seventh year of growth and still exhibits elevated levels of annual bromes. This circumstance <br />likely results from the shrub only seed mix that was used on this unit. All of the perennial grasses have <br />been volunteer species, so they have been slower to establish and compete against the aggressive <br />annual bromes. To the contrary, perennial grasses have increased considerably since 2006, when this <br />unit was last monitored (from 9% to 33% average cover). It is possible this area will need remedial <br />action to control the annual bromes. However, having an occasional revegetation effort that does not <br />perform as expected is a typical occurrence in Western coal mine reclamation. <br />As revegetation units age, they tend to "thicken" with desirable (planted) perennial species and <br />exhibit increased diversity, cover, and production. Given the approval of TR-72 which created more <br />suitable comparisons for vegetation parameters, most areas at Colowyo appear to be progressing along <br />the expected path toward an exceedance of success criteria by the end of the 10-year bond responsibility <br />period. The primary concern is with noxious weed populations (control must be maintained) and annual <br />brome populations exceeding the threshold whereby they become problematic. <br />Recommendation # 1- Apply Plateau or Oust Herbicide to Unit EP042 <br />In most cases at Colowyo, an elevated annual brome population in a unit would warrant a "wait and <br />see" approach to detect the progress or lack thereof of the population. However, the annual brome <br />populations on EP042 have continued to increase from 27.9% in 2006, to 33.5% in 2009. Although <br />perennial cover has increased, it appears that the "threshold" level of annual brome populations may be <br />approaching. This threshold level is the point where the bromes will begin to dominate unless <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 53 Colowyo Mine <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report