My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-03-12_REPORT - C1981019 (8)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Report
>
Coal
>
C1981019
>
2010-03-12_REPORT - C1981019 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:01:18 PM
Creation date
3/15/2010 9:40:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/12/2010
Doc Name
2009 AHR & ARR Section 9 (2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report)
From
Colowyo Coal Company
To
DRMS
Annual Report Year
2009
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Email Name
JRS
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
111
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of shrubs protected inside the fence is almost twice the average cover of shrubs outside the fence <br />(31.7% vs. 16.3%). In addition, the average density of shrubs inside the fence is substantially greater <br />than the average density of shrubs outside the fence (6,942 vs. 4,661 shrubs per acre). Differences are <br />more apparent with shrubs exhibiting greater palatability. Shrubs such as bitterbrush and Mountain big <br />sagebrush exhibit three times the ground cover inside the fence versus outside the fence. To the <br />contrary, a less palatable shrub, silver sage, exhibits higher cover and density outside the fence. Results <br />provided in the following three paragraphs are based on full sampling from 2008, and are supported by <br />data collected in 2009. <br />Perusal of Table 9 and Charts 17 and 18 indicate that average shrub cover continues to increase in <br />most of the treatments; however Treatment #2 (outside fence) and Treatment #5 (inside fence) saw a <br />decrease in average shrub cover with no explanation other than potential sampling error. The average <br />cover between fenced and unfenced areas was similar until 2002 when fencing was erected. Since 2002, <br />cover values from inside the fence have been increasing faster than outside the fence. Perusal of Table <br />10 and Charts 23 and 24 indicates that shrub densities have generally been decreasing since initial <br />sampling in 2001. This phenomenon is expected as shrubs become larger and the competition for <br />nutrients, light, and water increases. Furthermore, confidence in the data from CSU's efforts is <br />somewhat reduced given the sampling protocol utilized versus that utilized by Cedar Creek. CSU's <br />sampling protocols incorporate a significant component of undetectable sampling error. <br />Based on these interim results, it appears that 6 inches of topsoil with either one of the seed mixes <br />has outperformed both the non-topsoil and 20 inches of topsoil treatments with respect to vegetation <br />cover and shrub densities and diversity after eight growing seasons. Placing 18-20 inches of topsoil <br />appears to benefit primarily annual and perennial grasses and in this regard increases erosional stability. <br />Controlling access by native ungulates appears to noticeably increase cover (maturity) and densities of <br />shrubs, however, populations of shrubs outside the fenced area are presently far above the success <br />criterion for revegetation. However, results of this study should be viewed with caution as seeding of <br />these plots coincidentally occurred in an "excellent" shrub recruitment year mine-wide (based on <br />observed results for other revegetation efforts during this year). If these plots were seeded one year <br />earlier or later, the shrub cover and densities most likely would have been considerably lower. Continued <br />observation during the next few years will shed significant additional light on the progress of these <br />populations over the longer-term. <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 33 Colowyo Mine <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.