Laserfiche WebLink
2.5 Planted Seed Establishment <br />Perusal of Table 4 documents two indicator's of seeding success. The first is the overall seeding <br />success rate or percent cover of seeded species divided by total percent plant cover. This indicator <br />averaged 86.6% for 1999 revegetation, and 44.6% for 2002 and more recent revegetation (including <br />revegetation from 2005 and 2007). If annual bromes or other weedy taxa were overly problematic, the <br />seeding success (ground cover) rates would diminish with age, not increase. Therefore, it is expected <br />that the seed success for the 2002 revegetation (minus the shrub only seed mix area) will continue to <br />improve over time. The shrub only seed mix used on EP042 only exhibited 0.36% success. However, <br />total plant cover on EP042 is 69.5% with 34.7% coming from perennial species, 0.25% from shrubs and, <br />33.5% from annual grasses. While seeding success and the resulting cover from the shrubs is quite low, <br />it is encouraging to see how many perennial volunteers have established on the site. <br />The second indicator of seeding success is the "relative success" by species determined for each <br />year by dividing the percent of the seed base attributable to each species (based on number of seeds <br />planted) into the resulting percent ground cover documented by point-intercept sampling (Table 4 and <br />Charts 7 - 9). For example, if species Z comprised 10% of the total number of seeds planted and then <br />exhibited 20% of the resulting ground cover, a relative success of 200% would be realized (20/10). <br />Similarly, if species Y comprised 10% of the total number of seeds planted but only exhibited 5% of the <br />resulting ground cover, relative success of 50% would be realized (5/10). <br />Given this type of analysis, it has been Cedar Creek's experience that grass species exhibiting <br />between 20% and 200% relative success are typically appropriate for the seed mix and are being planted <br />at appropriate rates. Taxa with less than 20% relative success may need assistance through special <br />handling (e.g., boosting the amount of seed in the mixture or adding an appropriate fertilizer or <br />supplement), or are candidates for deletion or substitution. Taxa with more than 200% relative success <br />should be re-evaluated for possible reduction of the amount of seed planted. Elevated success rates are <br />often indicative of over aggressive taxa that can be detrimental to the overall community diversity. <br />Furthermore, decisions regarding seed mix manipulations should be based on multiple years of analysis <br />owing to climatic and other influences that occur annually. <br />Similar "boundary" values for forbs would be 5% and 150%. Forb populations typically require far <br />more seed to establish even minimal cover values, and most often, grass taxa are too competitive for all <br />but the most aggressive forb species such as adapted introduced plants like alfalfa and cicer milkvetch. <br />Finally, "boundary" values for shrubs in young reclamation would be 2% and 200% with the exception of <br />CEDAR CREEK ASSOCIATES, Inc. Page 28 Colowyo Mine <br />2009 Revegetation Monitoring Report <br />r <br />r <br />r