Laserfiche WebLink
A. Was not submitted with the application; should be revised to show proposed TR-65 <br />changes. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 7 was revised. <br />21. Map 09 - Hydrological Monitoring Location <br />A. The Legend does not provide a description of the solid brown area. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 9 was revised. <br />22. Map 27 - Subsidence <br />A. The heavy red and purple lines that represent the burn limits for the Band D Seams are <br />not identified in the legend. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 27 was revised. <br />B. Subsidence Monuments 37-A thru 37-D are "proposed" with TR-65, but the symbol used <br />does not reflect that status. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 27 was revised. <br />C. The legend does not have a symbol for the electric transmission line. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 27 was revised. <br />D. The legend does not have a symbol for the transmission towers. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 27 was revised. <br />E. The Outcrop-D line is missing for the eastern portion of the map. <br />The February 3, 2010 submittal of Map 27 did not have this requested revision. Please <br />update Map 27. <br />F. While there are UTM grid crosshairs on the map, there is no North arrow. <br />The Division has no further concerns. The February 3, 2010 Map 27 was revised. <br />Other Agency Letters <br />23. There have been three federal agency comment letters received for TR-65. All three letters are part of <br />the adequacy review for TR-65. The three letters are: <br />A. USDA-Forest Service letter dated December 10, 2009. This letter was received at the <br />Division and forwarded to BRL in a letter dated December 29, 2009. <br />6