My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-24_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-02-24_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 3:43:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/24/2010
Doc Name
Complete Text Submittal - Letter, TOC, 2.03 & 2.04
Type & Sequence
PR12
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.04.7 Hydrology Description <br />• <br />The USDA -FS controls surface access to any potential monitoring well sites. <br />A few years ago the USDA -FS made a formal decision, with public input, to <br />close Hubbard Creek road beyond the location of the DH -67 monitoring <br />wells. Therefore, they strongly discourage re- opening Hubbard Creek road <br />for access to a lower depth monitoring well site. The USDA -FS has approved <br />one site (DH -68) on Iron Point as a potential monitoring well site. <br />The location of DH -68 is shown on Map 9. Map 11 and Map 11 -1 present a <br />prediction of the depth of the water bearing zone above the upper B -Seam. <br />The depth to the water bearing zone is 2,350 -feet and the coal seam is 2,450 <br />feet deep at DH -68. The extreme depth dictates two separate monitoring <br />wells. A dual completion well would not be attempted at the required depth. <br />One well would need to be installed in the formation above the B -Seam and <br />one well in the B -Seam. The estimated cost to attempt to install the two <br />wells is in excess of one million dollars. <br />In late 2004, the Operator attempted to drill an exploratory hole from a <br />location approximately 2,500 feet northwest of the approved site. Poor hole <br />conditions were encountered immediately. As depth increased, the rock <br />became more fractured and keeping the hole open became virtually <br />impossible. At a depth of 2,612 feet the core bit was permanently stuck in <br />the hole. All down hole assemblies were twisted off and cemented into the <br />hole. The fractured rock is attributed to both the igneous Iron Point intrusion <br />and depth of cover. Similar drilling conditions are expected at potential <br />monitoring well site DH -68. <br />The Operator does not believe it is economically or technically practicable to <br />install down gradient monitoring wells north east of the proposed mine plan <br />area. The rugged terrain limits potential drill sites. The only location where a <br />reasonable depth monitoring well could be constructed is in Hubbard Creek <br />but the UDSA -FS does not want the Hubbard Creek road re- opened. <br />Opening the Hubbard Creek road would be problematic because of public <br />opposition, road slope instability and potential flooding. <br />It is highly unlikely the public will use the deep bedrock groundwater located <br />north of the proposed mine plan area. It is simply too expensive to install a <br />domestic or livestock well at such extreme depths. The poor water quality <br />would also discourage public use. The lack of deep bedrock groundwater <br />monitoring data is somewhat mitigated by the highly unlikely public use of the <br />water. <br />Based on the above discussion, the Operator requests relief from the <br />installation of a down gradient monitoring well for the northeastern mining <br />districts contemplated by PR -10, PR -11, and TR -65. <br />PR -12 2.04-31- 02/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.