My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010-02-24_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Coal
>
C1996083
>
2010-02-24_REVISION - C1996083 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 4:00:00 PM
Creation date
3/5/2010 3:43:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
2/24/2010
Doc Name
Complete Text Submittal - Letter, TOC, 2.03 & 2.04
Type & Sequence
PR12
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
144
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.04.6 <br />seven cycles of marine - nonmarine deposition in the Eastern Piceance Basin. <br />The coal deposits of the area were deposited as the complex relationships of <br />deltaic, fluvial, and barrier island facies were intermittently modified by <br />transgressive- regressive cycles of the retreating Cretaceous shoreline. <br />The coal bearing member of the Mesaverde formation locally contains up to <br />nine mineable coal seams in the North Fork Valley, named in ascending <br />alphabetical order, within the stratigraphic interval 500 to 600 ft. above the <br />Rollins Sandstone Member (Dunrud, 1976). Mines recently operating in the <br />various coal seams are as follows: Somerset - C & B -2; Sanborn Creek - C & <br />B -2; Bowie No. 1 - D -2; Blue Ribbon and Hawks Nest - E -1; Bear - C & B -2; <br />Mountain Coal Company - F & B -2. Due to the depositional environment of <br />the coal bearing member, individual coal seams are not laterally continuous <br />nor do they maintain uniform thicknesses from differing locations throughout <br />the area. <br />The barren member of the Mesaverde formation is lithologically similar to the <br />coal bearing member with the exception of virtually no mineable coal seams. <br />In the North Fork area, the barren member is stratigraphically between the F <br />coal seam and the Ohio Creek conglomerate, and was estimated by Lee <br />(1912) to be 1500 ft. thick. The scarcity of coal deposits within the barren <br />member probably represents progradation of terrigenous; nonmarine <br />sediments deposited in response to the retreating shoreline. Hail (1972) <br />reports maximum thickness of the entire Mesaverde Formation to be about <br />2300 ft. <br />The Paleocene Ohio Creek Formation unconformably over lies the <br />Mesaverde formation. The Ohio Creek Formation consists of light -gray, <br />locally conglomeratic sandstone which ranges in thickness from locally 0 ft. <br />to a maximum of 200 ft. Where the conglomeratic facies is lacking or <br />obscured by surficial deposits, the Ohio Creek Formation is mapped within <br />the Mesaverde Formation (Hail, 1972). <br />The Eocene Wasatch Formation consists of variegated mudstone and <br />siltstone with interbedded medium gray lenticular sandstone, which is locally <br />conglomeratic (Junge, 1978). Maximum thickness is reported to be <br />approximately 1600 ft. (Hail, 1972), although exposures are largely obscured <br />PR-12 2.04-15- 02/10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.